Results 21 to 30 of about 280,617 (296)

Growing a peer review culture among graduate students [PDF]

, 2009
Usual processes for pursuing education excellence in a graduate program are candidate selection, coursework, research, and thesis defense. This paper is an experience report on a complementary approach: the growing of a peer review culture among graduate
Renata Tavares da Silva Lemos, Roberto Carlos dos Santos Pacheco, Possamai, Osmar, Lemos, Renata T. da S., Gilberto Corrêa de Souza, Vinícius Medina Kern, Paulo Mauricio Selig, Sandro Rautenberg, Osmar Possamai, Kern, Vinícius M., Rautenberg, Sandro, Selig, Paulo M., Souza, Gilberto C. de, Pacheco, Roberto C. S.   +13 more
core   +1 more source

Conflict of interest in the peer review process: A survey of peer review reports.

PLoS ONE, 2023
ObjectivesTo assess the extent to which peer reviewers and journals editors address study funding and authors' conflicts of interests (COI). Also, we aimed to assess the extent to which peer reviewers and journals editors reported and commented on their ...
Adham Makarem, Rayan Mroué, Halima Makarem, Laura Diab, Bashar Hassan, Joanne Khabsa, Elie A Akl   +6 more
doaj   +3 more sources

Who Is (Likely) Peer-Reviewing Your Papers? A Partial Insight into the World’s Top Reviewers

Publications, 2019
Scientific publishing is experiencing unprecedented growth in terms of outputs across all fields. Inevitably this creates pressure throughout the system on a number of entities.
Francesco Pomponi, Bernardino D’Amico, Tom Rye   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

Thank You to Our 2022 Peer Reviewers [PDF]

, 2023
Plain Language Summary Thank you to the 1528 reviewers who provided 2647 reviews during 2022 to ensure the high quality and integrity of JGR‐Oceans manuscripts.
Wahlin, Anna, Li, Yuanlong, Chellappan Gnanaseelan, Gnanaseelan, Chellappan, O’Callaghan, Joanne, Nagai, Takeyoshi, Xu, Fanghua, Mulligan, Ryan P., Christopher Sherwood, Lars Umlauf, Friedrichs, Marjorie A. M., von Schuckmann, Karina, Karina von Schuckmann, Ryan P. Mulligan, Beal, Lisa M., Léon Chafik, Hannah E. Power, Takeyoshi Nagai, Arvind Singh, Chafik, Léon, Lisa M. Beal, Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs, Fanghua Xu, Chafik, Léon,, Lei Zhou, O’Callaghan, Joanne (Joe), Anna Wahlin, Singh, Arvind, Zhou, Lei, Nathalie F. Goodkin, Yuanlong Li, Joanne (Joe) O’Callaghan, Fawcett, Sarah, Sherwood, Christopher, Sarah Fawcett, Goodkin, Nathalie F., Umlauf, Lars, Schuckmann, Karina, Power, Hannah E.   +38 more
core   +2 more sources

Peer reviewers

Altre Modernità, 2020
Peer ...
Emanuele Monegato
doaj   +1 more source

Peer Reviewers as Co-Authors

, 2021
Open peer review is a process in which names of peer reviewers of papers submitted to academic journals are disclosed to the authors of the papers in question. Peer reviewing is a tough task, it requires large amounts of knowledge and effort.
Matheus Pereira Lobo
core   +1 more source

Peer reviewers 2023

, 2023
Peer reviewers 2023 ...
Monegato, Emanuele
core   +1 more source

Acknowledgements

Engaged Scholar Journal
.
Engaged Scholar Journal
doaj   +3 more sources

Lessons from Technology and Intellectual Property in the Oil and Gas Industry in Scotland: a Scholarly Journey and an Empirical Review

SCRIPTed: A Journal of Law, Technology & Society, 2014
This article explores the intersection between regulation and community practice in the energy sector in Scotland, from the perspective of providing a base for new approaches to the development of new technologies.
Abbe E. L. Brown
doaj   +1 more source

How many manuscripts should I peer review per year?

, 2020
Peer review provides the foundation for the scholarly publishing system. The conventional peer review system consists of using authors of articles as reviewers for other colleagues' manuscripts in a collaborative-basis system.
Salgado, TM, Pharmacy, Practice 2019 peer reviewers, Tonin, FS, Fernandez-Llimos, F   +3 more
core   +1 more source