Results 11 to 20 of about 519,096 (286)
Ad Hoc Peer Reviewers of Articles in 2008
Revista Ambiente & Água, 2008 A list of all peer reviewers (name and affiliation) that effectively reviewed manuscripts in 2008.
Getulio Teixeira Batista
doaj +1 more source
A guide to performing a peer review of randomised controlled trials [PDF]
, 2015 Peer review of journal articles is an important step in the research process. Editors rely on the expertise of peer reviewers to properly assess submissions.
Del Mar, Chris, Hoffmann, Tammy C.
core +2 more sources
The Miracle of Peer Review and Development in Science: An Agent-Based Model [PDF]
, 2016 It is not easy to rationalize how peer review, as the current grassroots of science, can work based on voluntary contributions of reviewers. There is no rationale to write impartial and thorough evaluations.
Righi, Simone, Takács, Károly
core +5 more sources
Veterinary Evidence, 2017 The work of a reviewer is a challenging commitment. There are no monetary rewards and their time and dedication often go unrecognised although no journal could exist without them.
Peter Cockcroft
doaj +1 more source
Evaluation of existing and new methods of tracking glacier terminus change [PDF]
, 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors thank two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments that helped to improve the manuscript. This research was financially supported by J.M.L.’s PhD funding from UK Natural Environment Research Council grant No.
Brice R. Rea +4 more
core +2 more sources
Roles and Responsibilities for Peer Reviewers of International Journals
Publications, 2023 There is a noticeable paucity of recently published research on the roles and responsibilities of peer reviewers for international journals. Concurrently, the pool of these peer reviewers is decreasing.
Carol Nash
doaj +1 more source
Peer review: Peerless review [PDF]
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2006 Peer review is indeed ‘... a flawed process, full of easily identified defects with little evidence that it works’, as Richard Smith concludes in his thoughtful article (April 2006 JRSM1)—but even flawed refereeing is better than not being peer reviewed at all.
openaire +3 more sources
Conflict of interest in the peer review process: A survey of peer review reports.
PLoS ONE, 2023 ObjectivesTo assess the extent to which peer reviewers and journals editors address study funding and authors' conflicts of interests (COI). Also, we aimed to assess the extent to which peer reviewers and journals editors reported and commented on their ...
Adham Makarem +6 more
doaj +3 more sources
Peer review and the publication process [PDF]
, 2016 Aims: To provide an overview of the peer review process, its various types, selection of peer reviewers, the purpose and significance of the peer review with regard to the assessment and management of quality of publications in academic journals ...
Armstrong S.J. +11 more
core +3 more sources
Digital Innovation Through Partnership Between Nature Conservation Organisations and Academia : A Qualitative Impact Assessment [PDF]
, 2015 We would like to thank all interviewees for sharing their experiences of working with academics, and the guest editor and three anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on earlier versions of the work. The research in this paper is supported by the RCUK
Edwards, Peter +3 more
core +2 more sources