Results 51 to 60 of about 280,617 (296)
Vascular Specialist International, 2021 Peer review is an essential part in ensuring the quality of papers published in scientific journals. Good reviews are beneficial for both authors and journal editors by providing authors with the opportunity to improve their manuscripts and editors with ...
Suh Min Kim, Soo Ho Kim, Seung-Kee Min
doaj +1 more source
Tau acetylation at K331 has limited impact on tau pathology in vivo
FEBS Letters, EarlyView.We mapped tau post‐translational modifications in humanized MAPT knock‐in mice and in amyloid‐bearing double knock‐in mice. Acetylation within the repeat domain, particularly around K331, showed modest increases under amyloid pathology. To test functional relevance, we generated MAPTK331Q knock‐in mice.
Shoko Hashimoto +3 more
wiley +1 more source
Recognition and reward system for peer-reviewers [PDF]
, 2018 Peer reviewing plays an important role in the academic publishing process that scrutinizes and provides feedback on the scientific work prior to publication.
Jan, Zeeshan
core
Calpain small subunit homodimerization is robust and calcium‐independent
FEBS Letters, EarlyView.Calpains dimerize via penta‐EF‐hand (PEF) domains. Using single‐molecule force spectroscopy, we measured the strength and kinetics of PEF–PEF homodimer binding. The interaction is robust, shows a transient conformational step before dissociation, and remains largely insensitive to Ca2+.
Nesha May O. Andoy +4 more
wiley +1 more source
Structural insights into an engineered feruloyl esterase with improved MHET degrading properties
FEBS Letters, EarlyView.A feruloyl esterase was engineered to mimic key features of MHETase, enhancing the degradation of PET oligomers. Structural and computational analysis reveal how a point mutation stabilizes the active site and reshapes the binding cleft, expading substrate scope.
Panagiota Karampa +5 more
wiley +1 more source
FOSE : a framework for open science evaluation
, 2012 Pre-publication peer review of scientific literature in its present state suffers from a lack of evaluation validity and transparency to the community.
Walther, Alexander +5 more
core +1 more source
Peer Advocacy: Expressions of Loyalty in Peer Review
, 2022 Peer review is the most legitimate form of evaluation in academia, and a pillar of many decisions and processes in education, research, and other areas of life in higher education.
Kristina Edström +3 more
core +1 more source
Gut microbiome and aging—A dynamic interplay of microbes, metabolites, and the immune system
FEBS Letters, EarlyView.Age‐dependent shifts in microbial communities engender shifts in microbial metabolite profiles. These in turn drive shifts in barrier surface permeability of the gut and brain and induce immune activation. When paired with preexisting age‐related chronic inflammation this increases the risk of neuroinflammation and neurodegenerative diseases.
Aaron Mehl, Eran Blacher
wiley +1 more source
Improving peer-review by developing reviewers’ feedback literacy [PDF]
, 2021 There is a need to train journal peer reviewers to provide professional, constructive, and actionable feedback: i.e., develop their feedback literacy.Journals and publishers can improve the way they support peer reviewers' feedback literacy by raising ...
Sin Wang Chong, Chong, Sin Wang
core +1 more source
BMJ Open, 2020 Objectives To examine whether the gender of applicants and peer reviewers and other factors influence peer review of grant proposals submitted to a national funding agency.Setting Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF).Design Cross-sectional analysis ...
Joao Martins +5 more
doaj +1 more source