Results 31 to 40 of about 185,473 (164)

Ondansetron for irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea: randomised controlled trial

open access: yesEfficacy and Mechanism Evaluation, 2023
Background Irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea is characterised by frequent, loose or watery stools with associated urgency, resulting in marked reduction of quality of life. Ondansetron, a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist, has been shown to
David Gunn   +23 more
doaj   +1 more source

A randomised controlled trial of an Intervention to Improve Compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines (IICARus)

open access: yesResearch Integrity and Peer Review, 2019
Background The ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) guidelines are widely endorsed but compliance is limited. We sought to determine whether journal-requested completion of an ARRIVE checklist improves full compliance with the ...
Kaitlyn Hair   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

Is the randomised controlled trial the best?

open access: yesSouth African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2014
Different study formats are preferred for different research objectives. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have a greater ability to test efficacy than other methods, but RCTs can have many limitations. These limitations should be explored, assessed and exposed.
openaire   +2 more sources

Trial of Acute Femoral Fracture Fixation (TrAFFix): study protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial

open access: yesTrials, 2017
Background Distal femoral fractures are a source of considerable morbidity and best treatment is currently uncertain. The Trial of Acute Femoral Fracture Fixation (TrAFFix) is a randomised, parallel-group feasibility study designed to inform the design ...
Xavier L. Griffin   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source

A longitudinal assessment of trial protocols approved by research ethics committees: The Adherance to SPIrit REcommendations in the UK (ASPIRE-UK) study

open access: yesTrials, 2022
Background To assess the quality of reporting of RCT protocols approved by UK research ethics committees before and after the publication of the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guideline.
Benjamin Speich   +11 more
doaj   +1 more source

Enteral lactoferrin to prevent infection for very preterm infants: the ELFIN RCT

open access: yesHealth Technology Assessment, 2018
Background: Infections acquired in hospital are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in very preterm infants. Several small trials have suggested that supplementing the enteral diet of very preterm infants with lactoferrin, an antimicrobial ...
James Griffiths   +15 more
doaj   +1 more source

The SMILES trial: an important first step

open access: yesBMC Medicine, 2018
The SMILES trial was the first intervention study to test dietary improvement as a treatment strategy for depression. Molendijk et al. propose that expectation bias and difficulties with blinding might account for the large effect size.
Felice N. Jacka   +13 more
doaj   +1 more source

Randomised controlled trials are important

open access: yesBMJ, 1999
EDITOR—Cranberg's arguments against controlled trials and in favour of historical controls supported by data on matching for known risk factors are seriously flawed.1 There are at least four fallacies. Firstly, the matching procedures …
openaire   +3 more sources

School-based group interpersonal therapy for adolescents with depression in Nepal: protocol for a phase III realist cluster-randomised controlled trial

open access: yesBMC Psychiatry
Background Depression is a leading cause of disability among adolescents, with the burden disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where access to mental health care is limited.
Kelly Rose-Clarke   +14 more
doaj   +1 more source

Factors associated with recruitment to randomised controlled trials in general practice: protocol for a systematic review

open access: yesTrials, 2019
Background Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are frequently unable to recruit sufficient numbers of participants. This affects the trial’s ability to answer the proposed research question, wastes resources and can be unethical.
Keith R. Moffat   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy