Results 221 to 230 of about 95,023 (252)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Testimonial Injustice and Mindreading
Hypatia, 2016Miranda Fricker maintains that testimonial responsibility is the proper corrective to testimonial injustice. She proposes a perceptual‐like “testimonial sensibility” to explain the transmission of knowledge through testimony. This sensibility is the means by which a hearer perceives an interlocutor's credibility level. When prejudice causes a hearer to
openaire +1 more source
Children, credibility, and testimonial injustice
Journal of Social Philosophy, 2021According to Miranda Fricker (2007), a person suffers testimonial injustice when they suffer a wrongful credibility deficit—that is, when their assertions are met with undue skepticism. As yet, there is no discussion of testimonial injustice against the elderly. There is, however, an emerging discussion of testimonial injustice against children. That
openaire +2 more sources
2007
Abstract This chapter formulates a working definition of social power, and identifies and defines a sub-type — identity power. The first kind of epistemic injustice is explored: testimonial injustice, wherein a speaker receives an unfair deficit of credibility from a hearer owing to prejudice on the hearer's part.
openaire +1 more source
Abstract This chapter formulates a working definition of social power, and identifies and defines a sub-type — identity power. The first kind of epistemic injustice is explored: testimonial injustice, wherein a speaker receives an unfair deficit of credibility from a hearer owing to prejudice on the hearer's part.
openaire +1 more source
Rejection of Expert Testimony: A Patterned Testimonial Injustice
Social Epistemologyexaly +2 more sources
Testimonial Withdrawal and The Ontology of Testimonial Injustice
Southwest Philosophy ReviewConcepts like testimonial injustice (Fricker, 2007) and testimonial violence (Dotson, 2011) articulate that marginalized epistemic agents are unjustly undermined as testifiers when dominant agents cannot or will not hear, understand, or believe their testimony.
openaire +1 more source
Testimonial Injustice and Teacher Education
Action in Teacher Education, 2020This narrative inquiry explores the experiences of LGBTQ+ teacher candidates of color in a teacher education program. Composed of vignettes written by teacher candidates and narrative analysis to frame the significance of and contexts within which the vignettes were written, this study first offers insight into the ways teacher candidates understand ...
openaire +1 more source
Testimonial Injustice and Trust
Testimonial Injustice and Trust, 2023Altanian, Melanie, Baghramian, Maria
openaire +2 more sources
Epistemic Degradation and Testimonial Injustice
2021Abstract In this chapter, Geoff Pynn asks what is the nature of the wrong involved in cases of testimonial injustice. After raising problems for accounts that explain the wrong in terms of objectification, where speakers are treated as mere sources of information rather than as informants, and in terms of derivatization, where speakers ...
openaire +1 more source
Hinges, Prejudices, and Testimonial Injustice
Abstract This chapter revisits testimonial injustice through the lens of hinge epistemology, shifting focus from moral and social harms to the epistemic mechanisms underlying identity prejudice. Testimonial injustice arises when a speaker’s credibility is unfairly discounted due to membership in a socially marginalized group, as ...openaire +1 more source