Results 11 to 20 of about 180 (141)
: This research aimed at investigating the effectiveness of Toulmin’s model of argumentation within TWPS strategy on undergraduate students’ critical thinking on argumentative essay.
Eko Suhartoyo +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Argumentative Statements in The 2016 Presidential Debates Of The U.S: A Critical Discourse Analysis
This study investigates the argumentative statements of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump during the debates. By employing two theories, Van Dijk's Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and Toulmin's model of argument, it aims to expose how various ideologies
Andini Khoirunisa, Rohmani Nur Indah
doaj +1 more source
Identifying and promoting young students’ early algebraic thinking
Algebraic thinking is an important part of mathematical thinking, and researchers agree that it is beneficial to develop algebraic thinking from an early age.
Sanna Wettergren
doaj +1 more source
Exchanging Reasons: responses to critics
I provide responses to what I take to be the most salient aspects of John Biro, James Freeman, David Hitchcock, Robert Pinto, Harvey Siegel and Luis Vega’s criticisms to the normative model for argumentation that I have developed in Giving Reasons.
Lilian Bermejo-Luque
doaj +1 more source
Rhetorical and Argumentative Analysis of Persuasive Language in Rumi's Majalis Sab’ah: A Study Based on Toulmin’s Theory [PDF]
This study analyzes the rhetorical and argumentative structures of persuasive language in Rumi’s Majalis Sab’ah using Stephen Toulmin’s model of argumentation.
Faezeh Arab Yousefabadi
doaj +1 more source
Analyzing political discourse of the secretary general of Istiqlal party (PJD PERIOD 2011)
The purpose of this article is to offer an overview of Chabat's political discourse as a Moroccan politician and Secretary-General of the Istiqlal Party,“IP”.
I. ELIMADI
doaj +1 more source
This paper aims to illustrate how a teacher instilled norms that regulate the theorem construction process in a three-dimensional geometry course. The course was part of a preservice mathematics teacher program, and it was characterized by promoting ...
Oscar Molina +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Decoupling Representations and the Chain of Arguments
In this paper, I propose to understand argumentative decoupling—that is, the structural fact of the argumentative chain self-referring to one (or more) of its constituents (reason, data, conclusion, point of view) in subsequent arguments—as part of the ...
Cristián Santibáñez
doaj +1 more source
ABSTRACT Science teachers' ability to accurately judge students' knowledge and skills is essential for successful teaching and, thus, highly relevant to science teacher education. Findings from studies focusing on language and mathematics have shown that (pre‐service) teachers' judgment accuracy is not only subject‐specific but may also vary across ...
Johannes Poser +4 more
wiley +1 more source
Argumentation is a fundamental component of mathematical thinking, yet in school practices it does not seem to be given sufficient space, which is instead largely reserved for the memorization of formulas and rules. Through the lenses of Philosophy for
Andrea Maffia +2 more
doaj +1 more source

