Results 51 to 60 of about 37,213 (220)
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Volume 42, Issue 2, April 2026.ABSTRACT Background Artificial intelligence (AI), in particular, generative AI, plays an increasingly critical role in education. Studies have shown that learners' positive perception of generative AI‐assisted writing tools can benefit them in their writing processes and outcomes.
Sung‐Hee Jin, Ann Tai Choe
wiley +1 more source
Apel na sobeckost nebo na rozumnost? Případová analýza s využitím Toulminova modelu argumentu
Filosofie Dnes, 2019 Příspěvek se zaobírá Toulminovým přístupem k argumentaci. Hlavním cílem je přitom představit tento přístup a ukázat jeho aplikaci na vybraném materiálu.
Tomáš Ondráček
doaj +1 more source
Rational Reconstruction Reconsidered [PDF]
, 2010 Here is a dilemma concerning the history of science. Can the history of scientific thought be reduced to the history of the beliefs, motives and actions of scientists?
Nanay, Bence
core
Theorising and practitioners in HRD: the role of abductive reasoning [PDF]
, 2011 Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to argue that abductive reasoning is a typical but usually unrecognised process used by HRD scholars and practitioners alike.
Gold, J
core +1 more source
Review of Education, Volume 14, Issue 1, April 2026.Abstract Large language model (LLM) chatbots have rapidly emerged as powerful tools in education, offering new avenues to support social and emotional learning (SEL). Literature lacks synthesis studies related to SEL competencies and how LLM chatbots are used to foster them, that is, affordances.
Haolan Liu +3 more
wiley +1 more source
The Toulmin Argumentation Framework
, 2023 The authors present Stephen Toulmin's incredibly powerful framework for analyzing the structure of arguments: the Toulmin argumentation framework, or TAF for short. Every argument terminates in a claim, the end conclusion of an argument. Every argument also makes use of evidence of some kind. In short, the evidence is the evidentiary support upon which
openaire +1 more source
Analyzing Conversational Reasoning
Informal Logic, 1995 This work discusses an empirical study of reasoning as it occurs in conversations. Reasoning in this context has features not usually accounted for in standard methods for describing argumentation (e.g., Toulmin, (1964), Toulmin, Rieke, and Janik (1984)).
Merrilee H. Salmon, Colleen M. Zeitz
doaj +1 more source
British Journal of Management, Volume 37, Issue 2, April 2026.Abstract This paper focuses on pluralistic research designs in management and organization studies. While advocates often present such approaches as a means of reconciling practical relevance with scientific rigour, their philosophical coherence remains underexplored, particularly in relation to the paradigm debates of the 1980s and 1990s. Our analysis
Nicholas Black
wiley +1 more source
British Journal of Social Psychology, Volume 65, Issue 2, April 2026.Abstract Research shows that critically reflecting on ingroup privilege can motivate allyship. However, we lack a deeper understanding of how activists make sense of their privilege, how it contributes to their motivation to stay engaged, and how activism recursively affects the meaning‐making of social privilege. Building on social representations and
Frank Eckerle +2 more
wiley +1 more source
Evaluating Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Scheme [PDF]
Argumentation, 2005 Toulmin's scheme for the layout of arguments (1958) represents an influential tool for the analysis of arguments. The scheme enriches the traditional premises-conclusion model of arguments by distinguishing additional elements, like warrant, backing and rebuttal. The present paper contains a formal elaboration of Toulmin's scheme, and extends it with a
openaire +3 more sources