Results 31 to 40 of about 577 (176)
A Pragmatic Analysis of Fallacies in English Religious Argumentative Discourse
Fallacies are common errors in an argument and they undermine the logic of that argument. They obstruct the process of argumentation since they do not contribute to the resolution in difference in opinion. The current study investigates fallacies
Khawla Shukur Mahmood, Sundus Muhsin Ali
doaj +1 more source
ABSTRACT This study investigates the outcomes of the implementation of a first grade unit incorporating multiple modes of representation and genre‐based pedagogy to support writing instruction in the genre of sequential explanations. At the end of a 6‐day unit investigating the structure and functions of carnivorous plants, 47 first graders completed a
Rachel E. Wilson, Leslie U. Bradbury
wiley +1 more source
En este artículo, se presenta una breve sistematización acerca de la evolución del concepto de sangre que considera el período histórico que transcurre entre las concepciones de los egipcios hasta el siglo XVII, cuando Harvey consolida un ''modelo ...
Manuel Uribe +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Abstract This paper focuses on pluralistic research designs in management and organization studies. While advocates often present such approaches as a means of reconciling practical relevance with scientific rigour, their philosophical coherence remains underexplored, particularly in relation to the paradigm debates of the 1980s and 1990s. Our analysis
Nicholas Black
wiley +1 more source
Investigating lower secondary school students’ geometric argumentation structure using Toulmin model
Geometric argumentation has an important role in solving mathematical problems in geometric material, so students must have this ability. Each student has different thoughts, including when stating arguments.
M. Rizky Ramandani +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Good Reasoning on the Toulmin Model
Some solo verbal reasoning serves the function of arriving at a correct answer to a question from information at the reasoner’s disposal. Such reasoning is good if and only if its grounds are justified and adequate, its warrant is justified, and the reasoner is justified in assuming that no defeaters apply.
openaire +2 more sources
Supporting learner agency in collaborative writing with generative AI
Abstract To support learner agency in LLM‐powered writing environments, this research introduces a new interface that integrates two key features: an Argument Outline and a Similarity Viewer. These features were designed to enhance intentionality in writing and self‐monitoring of reliance on AI‐generated suggestions.
Sujin Kim, Hyo‐Jeong So, Kyudong Park
wiley +1 more source
The Abuses of Argument: Understanding Fallacies on Toulmin’s Layout of Argument
This paper provides a preliminary account of fallacies on Toulmin’s model of argument, one that improves upon previous attempts to understand fallacies on this argument scheme.
Andrew Pineau
doaj +1 more source
Explicit Methodologies for Normative Evaluation in Public Policy, as Applied to Carbon Budgets
ABSTRACT What could philosophical or justice perspectives contribute to climate (and other applied philosophy) policy discussions? This question is important for philosophers on government policy committees. This article identifies two novel concerns about such contexts (which I call ‘contingent selection’ and ‘committee deference’) and systematizes ...
Kian Mintz‐Woo
wiley +1 more source
Critical Review: On Reasoning and Argument
: This article reviews David Hitchcock’s selected papers, On Reasoning and Argument (Springer 2017). Résumé: Cet article est une critique de On Reasoning and Argument (Springer 2017) de David Hitchcock.
Geoff C. Goddu
doaj +1 more source

