Employing the Toulmin’s Model in Rhetorical Education
, 2011 This paper tests Toulmin’s model on the examples of persuasive speeches. The model largely remains faithful to Aristotelian form of rhetorical enthymeme, expanded by the backing of the warrant (i.e. major premise in enthymeme). Rhetorical education can benefit from the use of Toulmin's model in preparation of persuasive speeches (visual inspection ...
Tomić, Diana, Nikolić, Davor
openaire +1 more source
PENGAJARAN APRESIASI SASTRA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMAHAMAN ARGUMEN TOULMIN
Jurnal Tuturan, 2018 Belajar sastra disekolah tidak hanya bersifat afektif, tetapi juga memberi ruang untuk belajar secara kognitif. Pembelajaran sastra tidak hanya diarahkan pada perkembangan emosional pembaca (baca: siswa), tetapi juga pada perkembangan kognisinya. Mereka dilatih mengembangkan daya nalarnya pada saat mengkritisi pertalian peristiwa yang satu dengan ...
openaire +1 more source
A method for assessing students' interpretations of contextualized data. [PDF]
Educ Stud Math, 2023 Groth RE, Choi Y.
europepmc +1 more source
Fusion weighted features and BiLSTM-attention model for argument mining of EFL writing. [PDF]
Front Psychol, 2023 Yang J, Zheng M, Liu Y.
europepmc +1 more source
Inferences in judicial decisions about facts
Revista Ítalo-Española de Derecho Procesal, 2018 The essay deals with some problems concerning the logical structure of evidential inferences. First of all some premises are stated, mainly about the nature and the function of evidence in connection with the theories of judicial decisions.
Michele Taruffo
doaj
ARGUMENTATIVE STATEMENTS IN THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES OF THE U.S: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS
JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 2017 This study investigates the argumentative statements of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump during the debates. By employing two theories, Van Dijk's Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and Toulmin's model of argument, it aims to expose how various ...
Andini Khoirunisa, Rohmani Nur Indah
doaj
Toulmin's argumentation model facing non-deductive types of reasoning
, 2010 This paper tests Toulmin’s model on the examples of persuasive speeches, hypothesising that it is unable to incorporate the non-deductive types of reasoning (induction, analogical reasoning, cause and effect reasoning, and reasoning by sign). As a conventional Aristotelian form of rhetorical enthymeme, expanded by the backing of the warrant, this model
Nikolić, Davor, Tomić, Diana
openaire +1 more source
On the Psychology of Argument: A Structural Analysis of Former Muslims' Postings Within Malaysian Social Media. [PDF]
Front Psychol, 2021 Hashmi UM, Rashid RA, Munir R.
europepmc +1 more source
Developing Students' Critical Thinking Skills and Argumentation Abilities Through Augmented Reality-Based Argumentation Activities in Science Classes. [PDF]
Sci Educ (Dordr), 2022 Demircioglu T, Karakus M, Ucar S.
europepmc +1 more source
How & Why Toulmin Model Became Triangular
The Toulmin Model is introduced also to Japan, but in a unique way. While the original model consists of 6 elements, the model in Japan, called Triangular Logic Model, consists of 3 (claim, data, warrant). This paper discusses 1) the process of and reasons for the triangularization of the model and 2) pros/cons of this phenomenon.
openaire +1 more source