Results 21 to 30 of about 12,741,664 (270)
Development of an open peer review system using blockchain and reviewer recommendation technologies [PDF]
Science Editing, 2021 In order to create a transparent and sound academic communication ecosystem centered on researchers, we developed a system that applied blockchain technology to an open peer review system.
Dong-Hoon Choi, Tae-Sul Seo
doaj +1 more source
, 2023 Dan and James discuss the pros and cons of transparent peer-review, in which peer review reports are published alongside manuscripts, as a keynote feature at the recent Munin Conference on scholarly ...
Daniel Quintana, James Heathers
core +1 more source
Research Ethics Review, 2022 The purpose of the traditional peer review process (TPR) is to provide a more constructive and scientifically rigorous critical review of scholarly research that builds scientific rigor and validity within diverse academic disciplines.
August John Hoffman
doaj +1 more source
Transparency in peer review [PDF]
Nature Materials, 2011 Would the publication of anonymous referee reports and editorial decision letters of published papers benefit the scientific debate? Results from a trial seem to suggest this.
openaire +2 more sources
New frontiers of peer review [PDF]
, 2016 This news article introduces a new COST Action entitled PEERE (TD1306), which stands for New Frontiers of Peer Review (PEERE). PEERE is a trans-domain proposal which brings together researchers from various different disciplines and science stake ...
Franzoni, Chiara +7 more
core +1 more source
Ibérica, 2023 In this paper, we examine how referees establish interpersonal relationships by mitigating criticism and expressing compliments as a realization of politeness strategies through the analysis of a specific corpus of transparent peer review reports (TPRs ...
Derya Sönmez, Erdem Akbas
doaj +1 more source
Peer Advocacy: Expressions of Loyalty in Peer Review
, 2022 Peer review is the most legitimate form of evaluation in academia, and a pillar of many decisions and processes in education, research, and other areas of life in higher education.
Kristina Edström +3 more
core +1 more source
Şeffaf Hakemlik Modeli Nasıl İşliyor?
Eskiyeni, 2022 Bilimsel makalelerin alan uzmanlarınca yayımlanmadan önce incelenmesini ifade eden hakem değerlendirmesi, 20. yüzyılda yaygınlık kazandı. Bu uygulama, makalelerin kalitesini değerlendirmek için önemli ve gereklidir.
Abdullah Demir
doaj +1 more source
F1000Research, 2015 Open peer review, peer review where authors' and reviewers' identities are disclosed to one another, is a growing trend in scholarly publishing. Through observation of four journals in STEM disciplines, PLOS One, Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics, PeerJ ...
Emily Ford
doaj +1 more source
Letting the daylight in: Reviewing the reviewers and other ways to maximize transparency in science
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 2012 With the emergence of online publishing, opportunities to maximize transparency of scientific research have grown considerably. However, these possibilities are still only marginally used. We argue for the implementation of (1) peer-reviewed peer review,
Jelte M Wicherts +3 more
doaj +1 more source