Results 31 to 40 of about 12,741,664 (270)

Transparency showcases strength of peer review [PDF]

Nature, 2010
Bernd Pulverer reflects on his experience at The EMBO Journal of publishing referees' reports, authors' responses and editors' comments alongside papers, as other EMBO publications adopt the same policy.
openaire   +2 more sources

A scoping review on biomedical journal peer review guides for reviewers.

PLoS ONE, 2021
BackgroundPeer review is widely used in academic fields to assess a manuscript's significance and to improve its quality for publication. This scoping review will assess existing peer review guidelines and/or checklists intended for reviewers of ...
Eunhye Song, Lin Ang, Ji-Yeun Park, Eun-Young Jun, Kyeong Han Kim, Jihee Jun, Sunju Park, Myeong Soo Lee   +7 more
doaj   +1 more source

Empowering peer reviewers with a checklist to improve transparency

Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2018
Peer review is widely considered fundamental to maintaining the rigour of science, but it often fails to ensure transparency and reduce bias in published papers, and this systematically weakens the quality of published inferences. In part, this is because many reviewers are unaware of important questions to ask with respect to the soundness of the ...
Timothy H. Parker, Simon C. Griffith, Judith L. Bronstein, Fiona Fidler, Susan Foster, Hannah Fraser, Wolfgang Forstmeier, Jessica Gurevitch, Julia Koricheva, Ralf Seppelt, Morgan W. Tingley, Shinichi Nakagawa   +11 more
openaire   +9 more sources

Peer review types in European Association of Science Editors members’ journals: a survey study [PDF]

European Science Editing
Introduction: The number or percentage of journals publishing review reports or reviewer names remains unknown in today’s scholarly milieu.Methods: In January 2025 we sent a survey to all members of the European Association of Science Editors ...
Mario Malički, El Mehdi Ferrouhi, Hristina Prodanova, Seda Yilmaz Semerci, Taras Kotyk, Siphamandla Mncube   +5 more
doaj   +3 more sources

The Open Science Peer Review Oath [PDF]

, 2014
One of the foundations of the scientific method is to be able to reproduce experiments and corroborate the results of research that has been done before.
Förstner, Konrad, Attwood, Teresa K, Hèriché, Jean-Karim, Lahti, Leo, Smith-Unna, Richard, Schneider, Maria Victoria, Molloy, Jenny, Davey, Robert, Chue Hong, Neil, Vieira, Bruno Miguel, Bolser, Dan, Grigorov, Ivo, Dahlö, Martin, Alexa, Adrian, Markie, Michael L, Aleksic, Jelena, MacLean, Dan, Scott, Camille, Dinkel, Holger   +18 more
core   +1 more source

Peer Review in Academia

, 2022
In this chapter, we outline the notion of peer review and its relation to the autonomy of the academic profession and the contract between science and society. This is followed by an introduction of some key themes regarding the practices of peer review.
Levander, Sara, Sara Levander, Geschwind, Lars,, Wermke, Wieland,, Wieland Wermke, Forsberg, Eva, Wermke, Wieland, Levander, Sara,, Geschwind, Lars, Forsberg, Eva,, Lars Geschwind, Eva Forsberg   +11 more
core   +1 more source

Publication Bias: Evidence from a Comparative Study between Results-Blind Review and Transparent Peer Review

, 2023
Publication Bias: Evidence from a Comparative Study between Results-Blind Review and Transparent Peer ...
Ying He (16875288)
core   +1 more source

Publishing peer review materials [version 1; referees: 2 approved]

F1000Research, 2018
Publishing peer review materials alongside research articles promises to make the peer review process more transparent as well as making it easier to recognise these contributions and give credit to peer reviewers. Traditionally, the peer review reports,
Jeffrey Beck, Kathryn Funk, Melissa Harrison, Jo McEntyre, Josie Breen, Andy Collings, Paul Donohoe, Michael Evans, Louisa Flintoft, Audrey Hamelers, Phil Hurst, Thomas Lemberger, Jennifer Lin, Niamh O'Connor, Michael Parkin, Sam Parker, Peter Rodgers, Magdalena Skipper, Michael Stoner   +18 more
doaj   +1 more source

Introducing Life Science Alliance

Life Science Alliance, 2018
A new open-access journal by leading not-for-profit research institutions focusing on quality and reliability with a rigorous, transparent, and academically driven peer-review process.
Andrea Leibfried
doaj   +1 more source

Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science [PDF]

Scientometrics, 2020
AbstractOpen peer review (OPR), where review reports and reviewers’ identities are published alongside the articles, represents one of the last aspects of the open science movement to be widely embraced, although its adoption has been growing since the turn of the century.
Dietmar Wolfram, Peiling Wang, Adam Hembree, Hyoungjoo Park   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources