Results 11 to 20 of about 92,440 (199)

Transparent peer review at Nature Communications [PDF]

Nature Communications, 2015
exaly   +2 more sources

Transparency versus anonymity: which is better to eliminate bias in peer review?

Insights: The UKSG Journal, 2022
Peer review is a critical component of the scientific process. When conducted properly by dedicated and competent reviewers, it helps to safeguard the quality, validity, authority and rigour of academic work.
Faye Holst, Kim Eggleton, Simon Harris
doaj   +1 more source

Peer review: An essential component of scientific publications

Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Journal, 2023
The peer review is for the improvement of the manuscript. Additionally, it helps the editors make an informed decision about the suitability of the manuscript to be published in their journal.
M Mostafa Zaman
doaj   +5 more sources

Şeffaf Hakemlik Modeli

Eskiyeni, 2022
Eskiyeni dergisi olarak 46'ncı sayımızla birlikte, Yayın Kurulu’muzun 05/02/2022 tarihli toplantısında almış olduğu karar gereğince yayımlanan tüm makalelerin hakem raporlarını da hakem isimlerinizi kapatarak makalelerle birlikte okurların incelemesine ...
Abdullah Demir
doaj   +1 more source

Development of an open peer review system using blockchain and reviewer recommendation technologies [PDF]

Science Editing, 2021
In order to create a transparent and sound academic communication ecosystem centered on researchers, we developed a system that applied blockchain technology to an open peer review system.
Dong-Hoon Choi, Tae-Sul Seo
doaj   +1 more source

A modest proposal to the peer review process: a collaborative and interdisciplinary approach in the assessment of scholarly communication

Research Ethics Review, 2022
The purpose of the traditional peer review process (TPR) is to provide a more constructive and scientifically rigorous critical review of scholarly research that builds scientific rigor and validity within diverse academic disciplines.
August John Hoffman
doaj   +1 more source

‘Great work folks!’: establishing interpersonal communication in transparent peer reviews of research articles

Ibérica, 2023
In this paper, we examine how referees establish interpersonal relationships by mitigating criticism and expressing compliments as a realization of politeness strategies through the analysis of a specific corpus of transparent peer review reports (TPRs ...
Derya Sönmez, Erdem Akbas
doaj   +1 more source

Open peer review at four STEM journals: an observational overview [v2; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/5n1]

F1000Research, 2015
Open peer review, peer review where authors' and reviewers' identities are disclosed to one another, is a growing trend in scholarly publishing. Through observation of four journals in STEM disciplines, PLOS One, Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics, PeerJ ...
Emily Ford
doaj   +1 more source

Letting the daylight in: Reviewing the reviewers and other ways to maximize transparency in science

Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 2012
With the emergence of online publishing, opportunities to maximize transparency of scientific research have grown considerably. However, these possibilities are still only marginally used. We argue for the implementation of (1) peer-reviewed peer review,
Jelte M Wicherts, Rogier A Kievit, Marjan eBakker, Denny eBorsboom   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

Şeffaf Hakemlik Modeli Nasıl İşliyor?

Eskiyeni, 2022
Bilimsel makalelerin alan uzmanlarınca yayımlanmadan önce incelenmesini ifade eden hakem değerlendirmesi, 20. yüzyılda yaygınlık kazandı. Bu uygulama, makalelerin kalitesini değerlendirmek için önemli ve gereklidir.
Abdullah Demir
doaj   +1 more source