Results 11 to 20 of about 12,741,664 (270)
Introducing transparent peer review to RSC Advances. [PDF]
RSC Adv, 2023 RSC Advances is introducing the option of transparent peer review for authors. Editors-in-Chief Russell J. Cox and Karen Faulds, and Executive Editor Laura C. Fisher offer more detail on how this will work.
Fisher L, Cox RJ, Faulds K.
europepmc +3 more sources
The Peer Review Process: Past, Present, and Future [PDF]
British Journal of Biomedical ScienceThe peer review process is a fundamental aspect of modern scientific paper publishing, underpinning essential quality control. First conceptualised in the 1700s, it is an iterative process that aims to elevate scientific literature to the highest ...
John A. Drozdz, Michael R. Ladomery
doaj +2 more sources
Transparent peer review and open data at Communications Biology. [PDF]
Commun Biol, 2019 As of January 1st 2019, authors submitting manuscripts to Communications Biology can choose to publish the reviewer reports and author replies with their articles. The first articles with associated reviewer reports have now been published, representing an important step in our broader journey toward greater openness.
europepmc +4 more sources
Reading Peer Review – What a dataset of peer review reports can teach us about changing research culture [PDF]
, 2021 One of the first megajournals, PLOS ONE, has played a significant role in changing scholarly communication and in particular peer review, by placing an emphasis on soundness, as opposed to novelty, in published research. Drawing on a study of peer review
Gadie, Robert +9 more
core +6 more sources
A Necessary Complement to Transparent Peer Review: Editorial Transparency [PDF]
Cell Systems, 2019 exaly +3 more sources
Transparency versus anonymity: which is better to eliminate bias in peer review?
Insights: The UKSG Journal, 2022 Peer review is a critical component of the scientific process. When conducted properly by dedicated and competent reviewers, it helps to safeguard the quality, validity, authority and rigour of academic work.
Faye Holst, Kim Eggleton, Simon Harris
doaj +1 more source
Eskiyeni, 2022 Eskiyeni dergisi olarak 46'ncı sayımızla birlikte, Yayın Kurulu’muzun 05/02/2022 tarihli toplantısında almış olduğu karar gereğince yayımlanan tüm makalelerin hakem raporlarını da hakem isimlerinizi kapatarak makalelerle birlikte okurların incelemesine ...
Abdullah Demir
doaj +1 more source
Peer review: An essential component of scientific publications
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Journal, 2023 The peer review is for the improvement of the manuscript. Additionally, it helps the editors make an informed decision about the suitability of the manuscript to be published in their journal.
M Mostafa Zaman
doaj +5 more sources
Utilization and Effects of Peer‐Assisted Learning in Basic Medical Education [PDF]
, 2021 This review of the literature explored the experiences and effects of peer-assisted learning in basic medical education. Peer-assisted learning is most commonly utilized to teach clinical skills (including technical skills) and medical knowledge (76.4%).
Korean Medical Education Review (의학교육논단)
core +1 more source
Transparency in peer review: Exploring the content and tone of reviewers’ confidential comments to editors [PDF]
PLOS ONE, 2021 Abstract Purpose Recent calls to improve transparency in peer review have prompted examination of many aspects of the peer review process. Peer review systems often allow confidential comments to editors that could reduce transparency to authors, yet this option has escaped scrutiny.
Bridget C. O’Brien +4 more
openaire +5 more sources