Results 1 to 10 of about 92,341 (100)
Transparent peer review trial: the results [PDF]
Genome Biology, 2018 We describe the results of our year-long trial of transparent peer review and announce the adoption of transparent review as permanent policy.
Andrew Cosgrove, Barbara Cheifet
doaj +4 more sources
Transparent peer review one year on [PDF]
Nature Communications, 2016 The majority of our authors are opting in to publish reviewer reports of their ...
doaj +3 more sources
Transparent Peer Review: A Look Inside the Peer Review Process [PDF]
ACS Central Science, 2021 Sofia Garakyaraghi +3 more
doaj +3 more sources
The Necessities for the Transparent Peer-Review [PDF]
Iranian Journal of Public Health, 2021 No Abstract.
Jung Hun Lee +5 more
doaj +2 more sources
Transparent Peer Review of Grant Applications [PDF]
Iranian Journal of Public Health, 2021 No ...
Jung Hun Lee +5 more
doaj +2 more sources
Transparent peer review for all [PDF]
Nature Communications, 2022 Starting in 2016, we have offered authors the option to publish the comments received from the reviewers and their responses alongside the paper. As we believe that transparency strengthens the quality of peer review, we are now moving to publish the ...
doaj +2 more sources
Let peer review be transparent
Communications Earth & Environment, 2023 For all peer reviewed articles submitted from 23rd January 2023, we will publish the editor decision letters, reviewer reports and author responses, together with the published paper. Reviewers can choose to remain anonymous or reveal their identity.
doaj +2 more sources
Transparent peer review: the value is clear
Communications Physics, 2022 In January 2019, we announced to our authors and referees that Communications Physics would adopt Transparent Peer Review (TPR). What does this mean and how has it been received?
doaj +2 more sources
Trialing transparent peer review [PDF]
Genome Biology, 2017 Andrew Cosgrove, Louisa Flintoft
doaj +2 more sources
Possibilities for the peer review of interdisciplinary research: a small-scale qualitative study [PDF]
Research Integrity and Peer ReviewBackground Despite critiques from across academia, double-anonymised peer review is still considered the ‘gold standard’ quality-assurance tool for the publication of academic research. While some journals make use of ‘open’ peer-review practices to make
Georgia Vesma
doaj +2 more sources