Results 1 to 10 of about 3,756,307 (284)
Annotating Argument Schemes. [PDF]
Argument schemes are abstractions substantiating the inferential connection between premise(s) and conclusion in argumentative communication. Identifying such conventional patterns of reasoning is essential to the interpretation and evaluation of ...
Visser J +4 more
europepmc +14 more sources
An Epistemological Appraisal of Walton’s Argument Schemes
The article critically discusses Walton’s (and co-authors’) argument scheme approach to good argumentation. Four characteristics of Walton’s approach are presented: 1. Argument schemes provide normative requirements. 2.
Christoph Lumer
doaj +5 more sources
Analogical Argument Schemes and Complex Argument Structure
This paper addresses several issues in argumentation theory. The over-arching goal is to discuss how a theory of analogical argument schemes fits the pragma-dialectical theory of argument schemes and argument structures, and how one should properly ...
Andre Juthe
doaj +6 more sources
An Online Annotation Assistant for Argument Schemes [PDF]
Understanding the inferential principles underpinning an argument is essential to the proper interpretation and evaluation of persuasive discourse. Argument schemes capture the conventional patterns of reasoning appealed to in persuasion.
Lawrence, John +2 more
core +3 more sources
How to Disagree About Argument Schemes
Argumentation theorists often disagree about which scheme best represents a given type of argument (e.g. argument by analogy, argument from authority, inference to the best explanation).
Fábio Perin Shecaira
doaj +4 more sources
Argument Schemes in Computer System Safety Engineering
Safe Safety arguments are key components in a safety case. Too often, safety arguments are constructed without proper reasoning. To address this, we argue that informal logic argument schemes have important roles to play in safety argument construction ...
Tangming Yuan, Tim Kelly
doaj +2 more sources
Argument Schemes from the Point of View of Hamblin’s Dialectic
This paper aims at a normative account of non-deductive argumentation schemes in the spirit of Hamblin’s dialectical philosophy. First, three principles are presented that characterize Hamblin’s dialectical stance.
Jan A. van Laar
doaj +2 more sources
Disentangling Critical Questions from Argument Schemes
Critical questions have been understood in the framework of argument schemes from their conception. This understanding has influenced the process of evaluating arguments and the development of classifications.
Alfonso Hernández
semanticscholar +1 more source
Argument Schemes and a Dialogue System for Explainable Planning
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is being increasingly deployed in practical applications. However, there is a major concern whether AI systems will be trusted by humans. To establish trust in AI systems, there is a need for users to understand the reasoning
Quratul-ain Mahesar, S. Parsons
semanticscholar +1 more source
Argument Schemes for Factor Ascription
. Reasoning with legal cases by balancing factors (reasons to decide for and against the disputing parties) is a two stage process: first the factors must be ascribed and then these reasons for and against weighed to reach a decision.
Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Katie Atkinson
semanticscholar +1 more source

