Results 41 to 50 of about 563,191 (177)
On Appeals to Non-existent Authorities as Arguments from Analogy
Informal Logic, 2021 Herein, I consider arguments resting on an appeal to a non-existent authority as a species of argument from authority, and ultimately show them to be reliant on arguments from analogy in their inferential force. Three sub-types of argument are discussed:
Martin Hinton
doaj
ON THE DEFINITION OF CONDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS
Crítica, 2019 In 1971, Wellman coined the terms “conduction” and “conductive”to name a distinctive kind of reasoning, different both from deductive and in-ductive reasoning. Most authors think that the weighing of pros and cons is thedistinctive feature of conduction.
HUBERTO MARRAUD
doaj +1 more source
A Systematic All-Orders Method to Eliminate Renormalization-Scale and Scheme Ambiguities in PQCD
, 2013 We introduce a generalization of the conventional renormalization schemes used in dimensional regularization, which illuminates the renormalization scheme and scale ambiguities of pQCD predictions, exposes the general pattern of nonconformal {\beta_i ...
/CP3-Origins, Odense /SLAC +5 more
core +2 more sources
AI & Law, logic and argument schemes [PDF]
, 2006 This paper reviews the history of AI & Law research from the perspective of argument schemes. It starts with the observation that logic, although very well applicable to legal reasoning when there is uncertainty, vagueness and disagreement, is too ...
Prakken, Henry
core
Profiles of Dialogue for Relevance
Informal Logic, 2016 This paper uses argument diagrams, argumentation schemes, and some tools from formal argumentation systems developed in artificial intelligence to build a graph-theoretic model of relevance shown to be applicable (with some extensions) as a practical ...
Douglas Walton, Fabrizio Macagno
doaj +3 more sources
Studia Semiotyczne, 2020 DOI: http://doi.org/10.26333/sts.xxxiv2.02 The aims of this paper are to illustrate where previous attempts at the characterisation of slippery slope arguments (SSAs) have gone wrong, to provide an analysis which better captures their true nature, and
Martin Hinton
doaj
Informal Logic, 2022 An argumentation profile is defined as a methodological instrument for analyzing argumentative discourse considering distinct and interrelated dimensions: the types of argument used, their quality, and the emotions triggered.
Fabrizio Macagno
doaj
Argument Invention with the Carneades Argumentation System
SCRIPTed: A Journal of Law, Technology & Society, 2017 Argument invention (inventio) has traditionally been regarded as one of the five main components of rhetoric, but has remained an ambiguous, vague and highly contested concept, made even more confusing by its dependence on the Aristotelian topics ...
Thomas F. Gordon** Douglas Walton*
doaj +1 more source
Evaluating Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Scheme [PDF]
Argumentation, 2005 Toulmin's scheme for the layout of arguments (1958) represents an influential tool for the analysis of arguments. The scheme enriches the traditional premises-conclusion model of arguments by distinguishing additional elements, like warrant, backing and rebuttal. The present paper contains a formal elaboration of Toulmin's scheme, and extends it with a
openaire +3 more sources
Sensible schemes in aesthetic experience. Neuroaesthetics and transcendental philosophy compared
Aisthesis, 2017 My paper sets out to compare neuroaesthetics and transcendental philosophy, concerning the perception of schemes of imitation in aesthetic experience.
Lidia Gasperoni
doaj +3 more sources