Results 1 to 10 of about 54,796 (286)
Advances in the Theory of Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions
Informal Logic, 2008 This paper begins a working through of Blair’s (2001) theoretical agenda concerning argumentation schemes and their attendant critical questions, in which we propose a number of solutions to some outstanding theoretical issues.
David Godden, Douglas Walton
doaj +1 more source
Profiles of Dialogue for Relevance
Informal Logic, 2016 This paper uses argument diagrams, argumentation schemes, and some tools from formal argumentation systems developed in artificial intelligence to build a graph-theoretic model of relevance shown to be applicable (with some extensions) as a practical ...
Douglas Walton, Fabrizio Macagno
doaj +3 more sources
, 2015 We present and discuss three discontinuous Galerkin (dG) discretizations for the anisotropic heat conduction equation on non-aligned cylindrical grids.
Held, Markus +2 more
core +1 more source
Informal Logic, 2022 An argumentation profile is defined as a methodological instrument for analyzing argumentative discourse considering distinct and interrelated dimensions: the types of argument used, their quality, and the emotions triggered.
Fabrizio Macagno
doaj
The Enthymeme in Aristotle's Rhetoric: From Argumentation Theory to Logic
Informal Logic, 1999 Which properties are characteristic of the enthymeme in Aristotle's Rhetoric? There is no consensus on this point. The present discussion centres on three properties. 1. Is there always an implicit premise?
Antoine C. Braet
doaj +1 more source
Argumentation schemes from Hamblin's dialectical perspective [PDF]
, 2011 This paper aims at a normative account of non-deductive argumentation schemes in the spirit of Hamblin's dialectical philosophy. First, three principles are presented that characterize Hamblin's dialectical stance.
van Laar, J.A.
core
TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse [PDF]
, 2004 This paper reports some methodological approaches to the analysis of argumentation discourse developed as part of the two-and-a-half year project titled "Enhancing the Quality of Argument in School Science" supported by the Economic and Social Research ...
Erduran, S +2 more
core +1 more source
Defeasible Classifications and Inferences from Definitions
Informal Logic, 2010 We contend that it is possible to argue reasonably for and against arguments from classifications and definitions, provided they are seen as defeasible (subject to exceptions and critical questioning).
Douglas Walton, Fabrizio Macagno
doaj +1 more source
Argumentation Mining in User-Generated Web Discourse
, 2015 The goal of argumentation mining, an evolving research field in computational linguistics, is to design methods capable of analyzing people's argumentation. In this article, we go beyond the state of the art in several ways.
Gurevych, Iryna, Habernal, Ivan
core +1 more source
Scaring the public: fear appeal arguments in public health reasoning [PDF]
, 2012 The study of threat and fear appeal arguments has given rise to a sizeable literature. Even within a public health context, much is now known about how these arguments work to gain the public's compliance with health recommendations. Notwithstanding this
Cummings, L
core +2 more sources