Results 21 to 30 of about 245,470 (327)
After a brief review of string and M-theory we point out some deficiencies. Partly to rectify them, we present several arguments for "F-theory", enlarging spacetime to (2, 10) signature, following the original suggestion of C. Vafa. We introduce a suggestive supersymmetric 27-plet of particles, associated to the exceptional symmetric hermitian space ...
openaire +2 more sources
Analogical Argument Schemes and Complex Argument Structure
This paper addresses several issues in argumentation theory. The over-arching goal is to discuss how a theory of analogical argument schemes fits the pragma-dialectical theory of argument schemes and argument structures, and how one should properly ...
Andre Juthe
doaj +3 more sources
Argumentationsanalyse. Grundtræk af en modulær sprogvidenskabelig tilgang
In this article, the author presents some fundamentals of a modular linguistic approach to argumentation. Argumentation is seen as a matter of interpretation, and since interpretation phenomena depend on linguistic material as well as on context in the ...
Henning Nølke
doaj +1 more source
“I Said What I Said”—Black Women and Argumentative Politeness Norms
This paper seeks to complicate two primary norms within argumentation theory: 1) engaging with one’s interlocutors in a ‘pleasant’ tone and 2) speaking directly to one’s target audience/interlocutor.
Tempest Henning
doaj +1 more source
Civil Procedure as a Critical Discussion [PDF]
This Article develops a model for analyzing legal dispute resolution systems as systems for argumentation. Our model meshes two theories of argument conceived centuries apart: contemporary argumentation theory and classical stasis theory. In this Article,
Larson, Brian N., Provenzano, Susan E.
core +2 more sources
Useful Argumentation: A Critique of the Epistemological Approach
The main rationale for adopting the epistemological approach to argumentation seems to take the form of a criticism of the consensus theory. This criticism says that some instances of clearly bad argumentation count as acceptable instances of ...
Brian Huss
doaj +1 more source
Habermas, Argumentation Theory, and Science Studies: Toward Interdisciplinary Cooperation
This article examines two approaches to the analysis and critical assessment of scientific argumentation. The first approach employs the discourse theory that Jurgen Habermas has developed on the basis of his theory of communicative action and applied to
William Rehg
doaj +1 more source
A Modal Criterion for Epistemic Argumentation
In this paper, I spell out and argue for a new epistemic theory of argumentation. Contrary to extant views, this theory is compatible with a pluralistic framework on argumentation, where the norms governing argumentation depend on the aim with which we ...
Job de Grefte
doaj
Introduction to the Special Issue “Boundaries between dialogic pedagogy and argumentation theory”
Dialogue and argumentation are two processes that complement and mutually influence each other. However, this essential relationship is not sufficiently acknowledged by current educational research.
Chrysi Rapanta, Fabrizio Macagno
doaj +1 more source
Pushing the bounds of rationality: Argumentation and extended cognition [PDF]
One of the central tasks of a theory of argumentation is to supply a theory of appraisal: a set of standards and norms according to which argumentation, and the reasoning involved in it, is properly evaluated.
Godden, David
core

