Results 71 to 80 of about 354,519 (281)
Premise Acceptability, Deontology, Internalism, Justification
Acceptability is a thoroughly normative epistemic notion. If a statement is acceptable, i.e. it is proper to take it as a premise, then one is justified in accepting it.
James B. Freeman
doaj +1 more source
EPISTEMIC INTERNALISM AND TESTIMONIAL JUSTIFICATION
ABSTRACTAccording to epistemic internalists, facts about justification supervene upon one's internal reasons for believing certain propositions. Epistemic externalists, on the other hand, deny this. More specifically, externalists think that the supervenience base of justification isn't exhausted by one's internal reasons for believing certain ...
openaire +3 more sources
Abstract The issue of inequality caused by algorithms, termed ‘algorithmic inequality’, has recently attracted scholarly attention in many disciplines due to its profound implications for society. While the body of literature on algorithmic inequality has grown, there remains a lack of comprehensive understanding of its nature, drivers, and impact ...
Shiwei Jia, Jia Tina Du, Hui Yan
wiley +1 more source
Background: The number of studies on how to foster change toward advanced epistemic beliefs (i.e., beliefs about the nature of knowledge and knowing) is continuously growing because these beliefs are an important predictor of learning outcomes.
Martin Kerwer, Tom Rosman
doaj +1 more source
Abstract Information science rests on a compact: its mediating signs maintain a traceable relation to what they describe. Large language models (LLMs) break it architecturally, generating discourse that is statistically plausible yet epistemically ungrounded, while standard metrics (precision, recall, relevance) cannot detect the rupture.
Martin Thellefsen, Alon Friedman
wiley +1 more source
Epistemic Democracy and the Truth Connection [PDF]
If political decision-making aims at getting a particular result, like identifying just laws or policies that promote the common good, then political institutions can also be evaluated in terms of how often they achieve these results.
Robert Weston Siscoe
doaj
Epistemic justification and truth-conduciveness
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Rochester. Dept. of Philosophy, 2011.This dissertation concerns epistemic justification. In particular, it concerns whether epistemic justification is truth-conducive.
Plug, Allen (1976 - ) +1 more
core
Abstract Despite growing interest in the internationalisation of higher education, the experiences of international student parents, particularly international student mothers, remain largely marginalised in research and policy. This paper examines the emotional agency of international student mothers who leave their children behind in their home ...
Anh Ngoc Quynh Phan +2 more
wiley +1 more source
Abstract Racial inequalities are pervasive in higher education despite concerted efforts to redress issues of access, progression and continuation. Little attention has been paid to how universities themselves construct race within their policy texts.
Benjamin Hart, Mirna Šumatić
wiley +1 more source
Does the unity of reason imply that epistemic justification is factive?
Some externalists have recently argued that the unity of theoretical and practical reason implies that epistemic justification is factive. It is argued that arguments for the factivity of epistemic justification either (i) equate two actions that are in ...
Hirvelä, Jaakko, Jaakko Hirvelä
core +1 more source

