Results 41 to 50 of about 156 (155)
The maturation of the Gettier problem [PDF]
Edmund Gettier s paper Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? first appeared in an issue of Analysis (Vol. 23, No. 6), dated June of 1963, and although it s tempting (and common) to wax hyperbolic when discussing the paper s importance and influence, it is fair to say that its impact on contemporary philosophy has been substantial and wide-ranging ...
openaire +1 more source
Danger signals for untrustworthy thought experiments
Abstract A key question in contemporary metaphilosophy of thought experiments is the “wheat from chaff” problem: How can we separate the good and trustworthy thought experiments from the untrustworthy ones? This article examines this problem by viewing thought experimentation as a form of mental simulation.
Henri Tuohimaa
wiley +1 more source
Evidentialism, justification, and knowledge‐first
Abstract This paper examines the relationship between evidentialism, knowledge‐first epistemology, (E=K) in particular, and justification. Evidentialism gives an account of justified belief in terms of evidence but is silent on the nature of evidence. Knowledge‐first tells us what evidence is but stands in need of an agreed account of justification. So
Alexander Bird
wiley +1 more source
Unveiling the nature of philosophical problems: Formal and conceptual aspects
Abstract This paper approximates an intensional definitional distinction between philosophical problems and non‐philosophical problems. It contends that a philosophical problem consists of an inconsistent set M of propositions that satisfies certain characteristics.
Jens Harbecke
wiley +1 more source
What the golden rule teaches us about ethics
Abstract The Golden Rule is regularly used in ordinary life, across many different cultures, to acquire new moral knowledge. At the same time, the Golden Rule is widely ignored both in ethics and metaethics because it seems to be an implausible normative theory.
Shane William Ward
wiley +1 more source
Perspectives and good dispositions
Abstract In some cases we can only conform to norms like Choose the best! by luck, in a way that is not creditable to us. According to the perspectivist diagnosis, the problem with such norms is that they make reference to facts that may lie outside our perspectives.
Maria Lasonen‐Aarnio
wiley +1 more source
THE GETTIER PROBLEM IN CONTEMPORARY EPISTEMOLOGY
İlk insandan ilk medeniyetlere, günümüze ve gelecek yüzyıllara değin hiçbir zaman insanoğlunun, bilmeye ve öğrenmeye olan merakı ve bu yolda harcadığı çabası hiç bitmemiş ve bitmeyecektir. Zaten “felsefe” de bu demek değil midir? Yunanca da filo-sofia yani bilgelik, hikmet kelimelerinden türetilmiş, bilgelik sevgisidir.
openaire +1 more source
Two Types of Refutation in Philosophical Argumentation. [PDF]
Dutilh Novaes C.
europepmc +1 more source
Philosophical producers, philosophical consumers, and the metaphilosophical value of original texts. [PDF]
Landes E.
europepmc +1 more source

