Results 41 to 50 of about 157 (151)
Veritas, 2012 O Problema de Gettier (doravante PG) é um marco na epistemologia contemporânea. Passado meio-século do sismo filosófico causado pelo famoso artigo de Gettier (1963), as réplicas continuam e a discussão em torno do problema reacende-se. Adotando nós, como
Rodrigues, Luís Estevinha
doaj
The Ethics of Belief Debate and the Norm of Teaching
Educational Theory, Volume 75, Issue 2, Page 374-398, April 2025.Abstract The debate about the ethics of belief is a classic and it has given rise to wide‐ranging debates in epistemology, the philosophy of language, the philosophy of mind, as well as in ethics. In epistemology, the question is what the norms of belief are — should one believe what is true, what is well‐evidenced, what is pragmatic or what?
Ben Kotzee
wiley +1 more source
Senofane e il “non sapere di sapere”
PeithoAn examination of Xenophanes’ fragment DK 21 B 34 shows how it to some extent anticipates what is known in contemporary epistemological debate as the “Gettier problem.” According to the argument underlying this problem, it is not enough to have a ...
Massimo Pulpito
doaj +1 more source
Intuition‐denial and methods teaching: Prediction, reform, and complication
Metaphilosophy, Volume 56, Issue 2, Page 225-238, April 2025.Abstract According to a popular theory in philosophical methodology, there is a widespread misconception among philosophers as to their own methods. This misconception is that philosophers use intuitions as evidence. This is a fascinating theory, for various reasons.
James Andow
wiley +1 more source
Danger signals for untrustworthy thought experiments
Metaphilosophy, Volume 56, Issue 2, Page 209-224, April 2025.Abstract A key question in contemporary metaphilosophy of thought experiments is the “wheat from chaff” problem: How can we separate the good and trustworthy thought experiments from the untrustworthy ones? This article examines this problem by viewing thought experimentation as a form of mental simulation.
Henri Tuohimaa
wiley +1 more source
Evidentialism, justification, and knowledge‐first
Noûs, Volume 59, Issue 1, Page 22-46, March 2025.Abstract This paper examines the relationship between evidentialism, knowledge‐first epistemology, (E=K) in particular, and justification. Evidentialism gives an account of justified belief in terms of evidence but is silent on the nature of evidence. Knowledge‐first tells us what evidence is but stands in need of an agreed account of justification. So
Alexander Bird
wiley +1 more source
Unveiling the nature of philosophical problems: Formal and conceptual aspects
Metaphilosophy, Volume 56, Issue 1, Page 17-34, January 2025.Abstract This paper approximates an intensional definitional distinction between philosophical problems and non‐philosophical problems. It contends that a philosophical problem consists of an inconsistent set M of propositions that satisfies certain characteristics.
Jens Harbecke
wiley +1 more source
Two Types of Refutation in Philosophical Argumentation. [PDF]
Argumentation, 2022 Dutilh Novaes C.
europepmc +1 more source
Philosophical producers, philosophical consumers, and the metaphilosophical value of original texts. [PDF]
Philos Stud, 2023 Landes E.
europepmc +1 more source