Results 21 to 30 of about 112 (56)

Scientific opinion on the evaluation of substances as acceptable previous cargoes for edible fats and oils. [PDF]

open access: yesEFSA J, 2017
Abstract Shipping of edible fats and oils into Europe is permitted in bulk tanks, provided that the previous cargo is included in a positive list. The European Commission requested EFSA to evaluate the acceptability as previous cargoes for fats and oils the substances calcium lignosulphonate, methyl acetate, ethyl tert‐butyl ether (ETBE) and ammonium ...
EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM)   +25 more
europepmc   +2 more sources

EFSA ; Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 91, Revision 1 (FGE.91Rev1): Consideration of simple aliphatic and aromatic sulphides and thiols evaluated by JECFA (53rd and 68th meetings) structurally related to aliphatic and alicyclic mono-, di-, tri-, and polysulphides with or without additional oxygenated functional groups evaluated by EFSA in FGE.08Rev3 (2011) [PDF]

open access: yes, 2011
The Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids of the European Food Safety Authority was requested to consider evaluations of flavouring substances assessed since 2000 by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (the JECFA), and to decide whether further evaluation is necessary, as laid down in Commission ...
openaire   +2 more sources

Flavouring Group Evaluation 76 Revision 2 (FGE.76Rev2): Consideration of sulfur‐containing heterocyclic compounds, evaluated by JECFA, structurally related to thiazoles, thiophenes, thiazoline and thienyl derivatives from chemical group 29 and miscellaneous substances from chemical group 30 evaluated by EFSA in FGE.21Rev5

open access: yesEFSA Journal, Volume 21, Issue 2, February 2023., 2023
Abstract The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to consider the JECFA evaluations of 28 flavouring substances in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 76 (FGE.76Rev2). Twenty‐one of these substances have been considered in FGE.76Rev1. Seven substances could not be evaluated, because of concerns with respect to genotoxicity.
EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF)   +26 more
wiley   +1 more source

Scientific opinion on flavouring group evaluation 91, revision 3 (FGE.Rev3): consideration of aliphatic, aromatic and a,b-unsaturated sulfides and thiols evaluated by JECFA (53rd, 61st, 68th, and 76th meetings), structurally related to substances in FGE.08Rev5 [PDF]

open access: yes, 2020
The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings was requested to evaluate 49 flavouring substances assigned to the Flavouring Group Evaluation 91 (FGE.91), using the Procedure as outlined in the Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2000. Forty‐four substances have been considered in FGE.91 and its revisions (FGE.91Rev1 and FEG.91Rev2).
Younes, Maged   +26 more
openaire  

EFSA ; Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 94, Revision 1 (FGE.94Rev1): Consideration of aliphatic amines and amides evaluated in an addendum to the group of aliphatic and aromatic amines and amides evaluated by the JECFA (68th meeting) [PDF]

open access: yes, 2012
The Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids of the European Food Safety Authority was requested to consider evaluations of flavouring substances assessed since 2000 by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (the JECFA), and to decide whether further evaluation is necessary, as laid down in Commission ...
openaire  

Ochratoxin A and human health risk: a review of the evidence. [PDF]

open access: yesCrit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 2015
Bui-Klimke TR, Wu F.
europepmc   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy