Results 51 to 60 of about 3,098,750 (348)

Peer Review system: A Golden standard for publications process [PDF]

, 2018
Peer review process helps in evaluating and validating of research that is published in the journals. U.S. Office of Research Integrity reported that data fraudulence was found to be involved in 94% cases of misconduct from 228 identified articles ...
Lasker, Shamima Parvin
core  

Coupled-cluster calculations for the ground- and excited-states of the spin-half XXZ model [PDF]

, 2011
The coupled-cluster method is applied to the spin-1/2 antiferromagnetic XXZ model on a square lattice by employing an approximation which contains two-body long-range correlations and high-order four-body local correlations.
Merdan, Mohammad, Xian, Y.
core   +2 more sources

Thermostable neutral metalloprotease from Geobacillus sp. EA1 does not share thermolysin's preference for substrates with leucine at the P1′ position

FEBS Letters, EarlyView.
Knowing how proteases recognise preferred substrates facilitates matching proteases to applications. The S1′ pocket of protease EA1 directs cleavage to the N‐terminal side of hydrophobic residues, particularly leucine. The S1′ pocket of thermolysin differs from EA's at only one position (leucine in place of phenylalanine), which decreases cleavage ...
Grant R. Broomfield, Torsten Kleffmann, David J. Saul, Sigurd M. Wilbanks   +3 more
wiley   +1 more source

Exploring lipid diversity and minimalism to define membrane requirements for synthetic cells

FEBS Letters, EarlyView.
Designing the lipid membrane of synthetic cells is a complex task, in which its various roles (among them solute transport, membrane protein support, and self‐replication) should all be integrated. In this review, we report the latest top‐down and bottom‐up advances and discuss compatibility and complexity issues of current engineering approaches ...
Sergiy Gan, Victoria Scarpelli, Marten Exterkate   +2 more
wiley   +1 more source

Pediatric Orthopaedic Clinical Peer-review Triggers and Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation (OPPE) Metrics: An Ohio Statewide Consensus

Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America
Background: Two critical mechanisms to measure competency in pediatric orthopaedic surgery are case-based clinical peer review and ongoing professional practice evaluation (OPPE). However, we currently lack a standard set of triggers or metrics to inform
Julie B. Samora, MD, PhD, Kevin Baker, RN, Kerwyn Jones, MD, Michael Vish, MD, Susan P. Tourner, MD, Michael Vossmeyer, MD, Nichole Liston, RN, Todd F. Ritzman, MD, Michael T. Bigham, MD, MBA   +8 more
doaj   +1 more source

Peer Feedback Tool for Lectures & Small-Group Teaching

MedEdPORTAL, 2011
This resource is a teaching assessment tool designed to provide faculty members with information about the quality of their teaching based on peer observation.
Maria Blanco, Carol Capello, Maryellen Gusic, Wayne McCormack, Janet Hafler   +4 more
doaj   +1 more source

Evaluating research - Peer review team assessment and journal-based bibliographic measures: New Zealand PBRF research output scores in 2006 [PDF]

, 2012
This paper concerns the relationship between the assessment of the research of individual academics by peer or expert review teams with a variety of bibliometric schemes based on journal quality weights.
Anderson, David L., Smart, Warren, Tressler, John   +2 more
core   +3 more sources

The multidrug and toxin extrusion (MATE) transporter DTX51 antagonizes non‐cell‐autonomous HLS1–AMP1 signaling in a region‐specific manner

FEBS Letters, EarlyView.
The Arabidopsis mutants hls1 hlh1 and amp1 lamp1 exhibit pleiotropic developmental phenotypes. Although the functions of the causative genes remain unclear, they act in the same genetic pathway and are thought to generate non‐cell‐autonomous signals.
Takashi Nobusawa, Makoto Kusaba
wiley   +1 more source

Peer Comment

Internet Archaeology, 2015
Peer comment on Mapping the Structure of the Archaeological Web by Shawn ...
Andrew Bevan
doaj   +5 more sources

Maintaining Live Discussion in Two-Stage Open Peer Review

Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 2012
Open peer review has been proposed for a number of reasons, in particular, for increasing the transparency of the article selection process for a journal, and for obtaining a broader basis for feedback to the authors and for the acceptance decision.
Erik eSandewall, Erik eSandewall
doaj   +1 more source