Results 51 to 60 of about 12,957,925 (392)
The frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the honeycomb lattice: $J_{1}$--$J_{2}$ model [PDF]
, 2012 We study the ground-state (gs) phase diagram of the frustrated spin-1/2 $J_{1}$--$J_{2}$ antiferromagnet with $J_{2}=\kappa J_1>0$ ($J_{1}>0$) on the honeycomb lattice, using the coupled-cluster method.
Bishop, R. F. +3 more
core +4 more sources
Quantifying professionalism in peer review
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2020 The process of peer-review in academia has attracted criticism surrounding issues of bias, fairness, and professionalism; however, frequency of occurrence of such comments is unknown.
T. Gerwing +5 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Digital Chinese Medicine Research: an Overview
Digital Chinese Medicine, 2018 : Digital Chinese medicine (DCM) is an emerging interdisciplinary field developed from traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and information science. In this article, we consider the significance and propose an architecture for DCM research, and highlight ...
Hui-Yong Huang, Jun-Feng Yan, Zhi-Xi Hu
doaj +1 more source
Peer review: a process undergoing a required transformation
JLIS.it, 2022 The peer review process is undergoing transformation; this raises a series of challenges, some of which are discussed by the authors of the articles of this issue. Is peer review really peer?
Mauro Guerrini +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Data journals: types of peer review, review criteria, and editorial committee members’ positions [PDF]
Science Editing, 2020 Purpose This study analyzed the peer review systems, criteria, and editorial committee structures of data journals, aiming to determine the current state of data peer review and to offer suggestions.
Sunkyung Seo, Jihyun Kim
doaj +1 more source
Innovative Strategies for Peer Review
Journal of Korean medical science, 2020 Peer review is a crucial part of research and publishing. However, it remains imperfect and suffers from bias, lack of transparency, and professional jealousy.
E. Barroga
semanticscholar +1 more source
Structured peer review: implementation and checklist development [PDF]
European Science EditingTo address the low overlap between reviewer comments and the publication recommendations they make, as well as to suggest guidance on what kind of peer review report would benefit journals and editors the most, we introduced structured peer review to ...
Bahar Mehmani, Mario Malički
doaj +3 more sources
Peer review - Why, when and how
International Journal of Cardiology Congenital Heart Disease, 2021 Peer review has a key role in ensuring that information published in scientific journals is as truthful, valid and accurate as possible. It relies on the willingness of researchers to give of their valuable time to assess submitted papers, not just to ...
Philip J. Steer, Sabine Ernst
doaj +1 more source
Peer review of scholarly communication in health: Perspectives in the Internet age [PDF]
, 2003 Peer review is an established form of trust-marking and ensuring quality of scholarly communications. The advent of Internet has had its impact on peer review also. This paper examines the existing approaches of peer review utilizing the Internet. Future
Scaria, Dr Vinod
core
A Systematic Review of Peer Assessment Design Elements
Educational Psychology Review, 2023 The growing number of peer assessment studies in the last decades created diverse design options for researchers and teachers to implement peer assessment.
M. Alqassab +5 more
semanticscholar +1 more source