Results 51 to 60 of about 12,310,539 (395)
Innovations in scholarly peer review at Nature Publishing Group and Palgrave Macmillan
Insights: The UKSG Journal, 2015 The peer-review system is one of the cornerstones of quality, integrity and reproducibility in research, and its existence has enabled the scholarly publishing system to function for hundreds of years.
Amy Bourke-Waite
doaj +1 more source
The limitations to our understanding of peer review
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2019 Peer review is embedded in the core of our knowledge generation systems, perceived as a method for establishing quality or scholarly legitimacy for research, while also often distributing academic prestige and standing on individuals.
Jonathan P. Tennant, Tony Ross-Hellauer
semanticscholar +1 more source
The unpredictably eruptive dynamics of spruce budworm populations in eastern Canada
Population Ecology, EarlyView.We examine historical population data for spruce budworm from several locations through the period 1930–1997, and use density‐dependent recruitment curves to test whether the pattern of population growth over time is more consistent with Royama's (1984; Ecological Monographs 54:429–462) linear R(t) model of harmonic oscillation at Green River New ...
Barry J. Cooke, Jacques Régnière
wiley +1 more source
Reproductive Medicine and BiologyBackground Follitropin δ may be an alternative to conventional follitropin α/β for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) within assisted reproductive treatment (ART), but its efficacy and safety remain unknown.
Shinnosuke Komiya +4 more
doaj +1 more source
CHIMIA, 2010 One of the most frequently raised criticisms of the review process for manuscripts is that the length of time between submission of a manuscript and the editorial decision is overly long.
Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel
doaj +1 more source
Open peer review: some considerations on the selection and management of reviewers
JLIS.it, 2022 Open peer review (OPR) is a type of review that has long since made space alongside the more well-known single-blind and double-blind peer reviews. Despite this, we still do not have a shared definition by the scientific community and publishers.
Andrea Capaccioni
doaj +1 more source
A guide to performing a peer review of randomised controlled trials [PDF]
, 2015 Peer review of journal articles is an important step in the research process. Editors rely on the expertise of peer reviewers to properly assess submissions.
Del Mar, Chris, Hoffmann, Tammy C.
core +2 more sources
The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals
Nature Communications, 2019 To increase transparency in science, some scholarly journals are publishing peer review reports. But it is unclear how this practice affects the peer review process.
Giangiacomo Bravo +4 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
FEBS Letters, EarlyView.Venom peptides have shown promise in treating pain. Our study uses computer screening to identify a peptide that targets a sodium channel (NaV1.7) linked to chronic pain. We produced the peptide in the laboratory and refined its design, advancing the search for innovative pain therapies.
Gagan Sharma +8 more
wiley +1 more source
In Appreciation: A Thank-You to Our Industrious Reviewers
Marshall Journal of Medicine, 2022 The reputation of the Marshall Journal of Medicine depends on the authors' contribution; however, the standard of the Journal's level of excellence is also a consequence of the efforts of expert peer reviewers.
Darshana T. Shah
doaj +1 more source