Results 1 to 10 of about 254,254 (131)
Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open, 2021 Stephanie D. Wauson
doaj +3 more sources
Engaged Scholar Journal, 2022 The quality of our Journal depends on scholarly collaboration between the two groups of scholars, the authors and the anonymous peer-reviewers of their work. We thank both groups for their interest in and support of our Journal.
Engaged Scholar Journal
doaj +3 more sources
Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives, 2012 Peer review seems to have had its origins in 18th century England to combat plagiarism. But today, the objectives of peer review are to provide evaluations of the quality of scientific or editorial material submitted. Peer review provides a check on the validity of manuscripts and sets standards for scientific merit.
Robert P. Ferguson, Stephanie M. Griffin
openaire +6 more sources
Stressing the need for the pool of trained peer reviewers vs. authors’ suggested reviewers
Journal of Medical Education Development, 2023 This letter comes to you in the hope of emphasizing how important trained peer reviewers are for the scientific workflow of academic journals. Normally, between 1 and 3 independent reviewers are required to peer-review a single manuscript. Most papers in
Nematullah Shomoossi +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Peer review: An essential component of scientific publications
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Journal, 2023 The peer review is for the improvement of the manuscript. Additionally, it helps the editors make an informed decision about the suitability of the manuscript to be published in their journal.
M Mostafa Zaman
doaj +5 more sources
The collective management of performers’ rights in the UK: a story of competing interests
SCRIPTed: A Journal of Law, Technology & Society, 2019 In this article I examine the experience of UK performers using collective management organisation PPL, a UK CMO established by record companies that also manages the rights of performers.
Ananay Aguilar
doaj +1 more source
Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2022 Background The demand for peer reviewers is often perceived as disproportionate to the supply and availability of reviewers. Considering characteristics associated with peer review behaviour can allow for the development of solutions to manage the ...
Danielle B. Rice +4 more
doaj +1 more source
Peer review golden rules and good practice checklist [PDF]
Science Editing, 2016 This is a republication of Appendix 1, The Golden Rules and the Peer-Review Good Practice Checklist, from the author’s book, Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: guidelines for good practice, published in 2007 by Wiley-Blackwell ...
Irene Hames
doaj +1 more source
Educational Technology & Society, 2023 With the increasing bandwidth, videos have been gradually used as submissions for online peer assessment activities. However, their transient nature imposes a high cognitive load on students, particularly low-ability students.
Liang-Yi Li, Wen-Lung Huang
doaj +1 more source
Ad Hoc Peer Reviewers of Articles in 2008
Revista Ambiente & Água, 2008 A list of all peer reviewers (name and affiliation) that effectively reviewed manuscripts in 2008.
Getulio Teixeira Batista
doaj +1 more source