Results 161 to 170 of about 9,817 (201)

Relative Biological Effectiveness and Peripheral Damage of Antiproton, Annihilation, 2002-028 [PDF]

, 2002
Maggiore, Carl J, Martin, Gary, Martin, Kim   +2 more
core  

Advances in Radiation Therapy for Primary Bone Malignancies. [PDF]

Technol Cancer Res Treat
Li L, Tao W, Eid JE, Gupta S, Zheng S, Taswell CS, Trent JC.   +6 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Development and dosimetric verification of static SHArc: Step-and-shoot carbon ion arc therapy for LET_d escalation in pancreatic tumors. [PDF]

Med Phys
Baltazar F, Tessonnier T, Mein S, Liermann J, Qubala A, Debus J, Mairani A.   +6 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Definitive Proton Beam Therapy for Second Primary Non-small Cell Lung Cancer After Pneumonectomy. [PDF]

Int J Part Ther
Nakamura M, Ohnishi K, Okumura T, Fujioka D, Baba K, Murakami M, Mizumoto M, Sekine I, Inagaki M, Sato Y, Sakurai H.   +10 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Initial Experience With Proton Beam Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer at Shonan Kamakura General Hospital. [PDF]

In Vivo
Shiba S, Shiraishi S, Koizumi K, Fujimoto Y, Ishiai N, Tokuuye K, Omura M.   +6 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Dose-averaged LET escalation with multi-ion therapy for head and neck cancers: a phase I study protocol for a prospective, open-label, single-arm, single-centre trial (MULTI-ION-HN-I). [PDF]

BMJ Open
Ikawa H, Shinoto M, Koto M, Masuda T, Inaniwa T, Takiyama H, Isozaki T, Yamada S, Ishikawa H.   +8 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Feasibility and Outcomes of Perirectal Spacer Implantation in Previously Treated Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Salvage Proton Therapy Radiation. [PDF]

Adv Radiat Oncol
Yacoub I, Mehta K, Gorovets D, Hasan S, Choi JI, Chhabra AM, Lazarev S, Garg M, Simone CB.   +8 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy

International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2002
Clinical proton beam therapy has been based on the use of a generic relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.0 or 1.1, since the available evidence has been interpreted as indicating that the magnitude of RBE variation with treatment parameters is small relative to our abilities to determine RBEs.
Harald, Paganetti, Andrzej, Niemierko, Marek, Ancukiewicz, Leo E, Gerweck, Michael, Goitein, Jay S, Loeffler, Herman D, Suit   +6 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Determination of Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE) of Soft X Rays

Radiation Research, 1977
Differences in clinical results reported with the use of iodine-125 encapsulated implants compared to those with gold-198, radon-222, and iridium-192 prompted a study of the RBE, relative to60 Co γ radiation, of X rays simulating the spectral distribution of radiation from encapsulated125 I.
L, Zeitz, S H, Kim, J H, Kim, J F, Detko
openaire   +2 more sources