Results 281 to 290 of about 157,727 (346)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Arab World English Journal
This study investigates how AI-driven Automated Written Corrective Feedback can facilitate EFL writing, teaching, and evaluation in Arab schools and universities.
Bilel Elmotri +7 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
This study investigates how AI-driven Automated Written Corrective Feedback can facilitate EFL writing, teaching, and evaluation in Arab schools and universities.
Bilel Elmotri +7 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Effectiveness of Generative AI in Automated Written Corrective Feedback With Prompting
Journal of educational computing researchAutomated written corrective feedback (AWCF) tools play a crucial role in supporting English writing instruction. However, issues such as insufficient accuracy and hallucination have undermined users’ trust in these systems.
Jiahui Wu +5 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Journal of English Language and Culture
Writing in English for university students who use English as their second or foreign language can be challenging. This is not only because of the linguistic aspects that may be different from their first language but also because of the non-linguistic ...
Putu Sita Witari +1 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Writing in English for university students who use English as their second or foreign language can be challenging. This is not only because of the linguistic aspects that may be different from their first language but also because of the non-linguistic ...
Putu Sita Witari +1 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Oral corrective feedback on written errors
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2019Abstract The current study investigated the differential effect of two types of oral feedback – graduated oral corrective feedback (GOCF) in accordance with sociocultural theory (SCT) and supplemented direct oral corrective feedback (SDOCF) in accordance with cognitive-interactionist theory (CIT) – on Iranian pre-intermediate EFL learners’ written ...
Sajad Afshari +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Written corrective feedback strategies: A systematic review
Voyage Journal of Educational Studies, 2022In the last few decades, written corrective feedback (WCF) in Second language acquisition(SLA) has held great importance for L2 researchers. Technically, WCF consists of different forms, scopes, and tones compared to oral feedback and types and strategies.
Ushba Rasool +3 more
openaire +1 more source
The Effect of Written Corrective Feedback on Writing Accuracy in Senior High School
Literature Language and Cultural StudiesThe effectiveness of Corrective Feedback on the development of second lan-guage proficiency has been of great interest to second language researchers.
Xi Chen
semanticscholar +1 more source
Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran
This study investigates the efficacy of written corrective feedback (WCF) in enhancing the writing skills of university students learning English as a Foreign Language (EFL). The study aims to determine the overall effectiveness of WCF, identify the most
Revo Aditama Febrian +1 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
This study investigates the efficacy of written corrective feedback (WCF) in enhancing the writing skills of university students learning English as a Foreign Language (EFL). The study aims to determine the overall effectiveness of WCF, identify the most
Revo Aditama Febrian +1 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
EFL Learners' Processing of Written Corrective Feedback With Think‐Alouds for L2 Pragmatic Learning
TESOL Quarterly (Print)Although corrective feedback has been shown to benefit second language (L2) pragmatic learning, limited research has explored how L2 learners process corrective feedback in relation to their pragmatic development, particularly in terms of depth of ...
Hui-Tzu Hsu, Yuanfei Chen, Hsuan-Yu Tai
semanticscholar +1 more source
Engaging with written corrective feedback
Instructed Second Language AcquisitionThis paper extends a similar study by Kim and Emeliyanova (2021) by comparing the effects of self-revision (R) and peer-discussion (D) on linguistic accuracy following semi-focused direct written corrective feedback WCF. The study involved three groups of low-intermediate English as a second language (ESL) learners in a Sri Lankan university.
Waruni Iresha Ekanayaka, Rod Ellis
openaire +1 more source

