Results 1 to 10 of about 1,614 (162)
THE TEACHERS’ BELIEFS IN TEACHER WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON THE STUDENTS' WRITING
Examining EFL writing teachers’ beliefs is becoming an essential study since teaching is no longer being noticed merely in a behaviour term but rather as thoughtful behaviour as teachers are active, thinking decision-maker.
Dyah Fitri Mulati +2 more
doaj +7 more sources
Examining EFL (English as a foreign language) teachers’ beliefs and cognition has become an essential area of research as teachers are seen as active decision makers.
Wei Wei, Yiqian (Katherine) Cao
doaj +2 more sources
The grass is not always greener: Teacher vs. GPT-assisted written corrective feedback
Written Corrective Feedback (WCF) is a crucial pedagogical practice where teachers annotate student writing to correct errors and improve language skills, albeit one that is time-consuming and laborious for large classes or under time constraints. However, the advent of advanced generative artificial intelligence and large language models, specifically
Peter Crosthwaite
exaly +4 more sources
Teacher Electronic Written Corrective Feedback, Trends and Future Directions [PDF]
The past two decades witnessed increased attention in the role of Written Corrective Feedback (WCF) in improving the English as a second language(ESL) students’ written linguistic accuracy. Several methods were suggested, including the use of the electronic means of providing corrective feedback.
Arab World English Journal +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Affective damage from teachers� written corrective feedback
Several studies believe that providing feedback on a students writing task offers several benefits. However, giving excessive corrections on students mistakes can have a negative impact on the students feeling. This study aims to investigate English Foreign Language students emotional response to the teachers written corrective feedback.
Gartika Pandu Bhuana +1 more
openaire +3 more sources
In modern L2 academic writing enterprises, teacher-written corrective feedback can be either facilitating or debilitating depending on language teachers’ understanding, actual practices, and specific-classroom situations. Through this present small-scale
Kristian Wijaya
doaj +1 more source
Student and Teacher Preferences in Written Corrective Feedback [PDF]
For the most part, teachers and students agree that WCF is an important part of language learning (Corpuz, 2011); however, there is disagreement about the type of feedback that best facilitates students’ development. This disagreement extends both to the typology of WCF (i.e., direct, indirect, metalinguistic) and to the question of whether feedback ...
Nanni, Alexander, Black, Douglas Aaron
openaire +1 more source
Investigating Teacher Written Corrective Feedback as a Formative Assessment Tool [PDF]
The present study seeks to lay the foundations for a firmly-grounded understanding of Written Corrective Feedback (WCF) as a Formative Assessment (FA) tool through student writing. More specifically yet, it is concerned with examining the intricate correlation between Moroccan English Language Teachers’ (ELT) attitudes and practices with respect to the
Arab World English Journal +2 more
openaire +3 more sources
Written corrective feedback is essential in the teaching of writing skills to help prospective teacher enhance their writing performance. Lecturers try to apply strategies in committing written corrective feedback in fully online learning.
Ahmad Hanan, Edi Firman, Terasne Terasne
doaj +1 more source
EFL Teachers Perceptions of Automated Written Corrective Feedback and Grammarly
Automated Written Corrective Feedback (AWCF) tools have gained popularity in the instruction of writing in English as a foreign language (EFL) because of their ability to evaluate written drafts. Teachers have become interested in this aspect, as it can alleviate their workload, especially with lower-order concerns, such as vocabulary, grammar, and ...
Ali Dinçay AYAN, Nihan ERDEMİR
openaire +2 more sources

