Results 61 to 70 of about 11,952 (289)
LANGUAGING AND WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN L2 WRITING
The aim of this article is to introduce the application of languaging as the mediational tool to enhance the written corrective feedback’s effectiveness in L2 writing. Written Corrective Feedback (WCF) shows L2 learners their grammatical and ungrammatical errors in writing.
Sabariah Abd Rahim +3 more
openaire +1 more source
Glioma cells mainly express the endothelin receptor EDNRB, while EDNRA is restricted to a perivascular tumor subpopulation. Endothelin signaling reduces glioma cell proliferation while promoting migration and a proneural‐to‐mesenchymal transition associated with poor prognosis. This pathway activates Ca2+, K+, ERK, and STAT3 signalings and is regulated
Donovan Pineau +36 more
wiley +1 more source
Hippo pathway at the crossroads of stemness and therapeutic resistance in breast cancer
Dysregulation of the Hippo pathway drives nuclear accumulation of YAP/TAZ, activating stemness‐related transcriptional programs that sustain breast cancer stemness and fuel therapeutic resistance across subtypes, underscoring Hippo signaling as a targetable vulnerability. Figure created and edited with BioRender.com.
Giulia Schiavoni +11 more
wiley +1 more source
A Review of Foreign Research on Written Corrective Feedback
This paper mainly reviews the empirical research and descriptive research on written corrective feedback in foreign countries. In the introduction part, it mainly clarifies the theoretical and practical needs of the research on corrective feedback in ...
Si Zhou, Zhou, Si
core +1 more source
EFL STUDENTS’ PREFERENCE IN RECEIVING WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK
One solution to help EFL (English as a Foreign Language) students in writing skill is providing a written corrective feedback by a teacher. Somehow, it is also necessary for a teacher to know the appropriate feedback given to their students.
Puan Tursina +4 more
doaj +1 more source
Written Corrective Feedback: Focused and Unfocused
Finding the effects of Focused and Unfocused written corrective feedback is one of the commonest issues influencing the feedback methods currently in vogue. Broadly speaking, the way the instructors provide feedback is of great significance in terms of the improvement the students may make as a result of the supervision they are offered.
Bita Alimohammadi, Dariush Nejadansari
openaire +1 more source
E2A selectively regulates TGF‐β–induced apoptosis in KRAS‐mutant non‐small cell lung cancer
Ability to induce apoptosis by TGF‐β is frequently lost in advanced lung adenocarcinoma despite intact TGF‐β signaling. We identify E2A as a mutant KRAS–dependent mediator of resistance to TGF‐β–induced apoptosis. TGF‐β induces E2A via SMAD3 in mutant KRAS cells, and E2A silencing restores apoptosis and enhances radiation response in cell lines ...
Sergei Chuikov +3 more
wiley +1 more source
Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in the Short and Long Term
The purpose of this study was twofold: 1) to examine the general efficacy of different types of Written Corrective Feedback (WCF) on the errors of the target structure (past simple tense) in the short and long term and 2) to compare the possible ...
Mitra Samiei, Shu Sim Tam, Afsar Rouhi
doaj +12 more sources
Written corrective feedback is of a crucial role to the improvement of students’ writings.Every time their writing teachers provided them with the feedback, students should not hesitate to make use of it to develop their writing. This study discusses the
Amina ZEMIECHE
doaj
Direct vs. Indirect Written Corrective Feedback: Student Perceptions
Studies have shown that most teachers give written corrective feedback to written work in ELT, and that students wish to receive it; however, the debate regarding which type of feedback may be more effective is far from settled.
Anne Westmacott
doaj +1 more source

