Results 31 to 40 of about 117,145 (342)

Genotoxic and stress inductive potential of cadmium in Xenopus laevis larvae [PDF]

, 2006
The present investigation evaluates the toxic potential of Cd in larvae of the frog Xenopus laevis after 12 days of exposure to environmentally relevant contamination levels, close to those measured in the river Lot (France).
Baudrimont, Magalie, Boudou, Alain, Bourdineaud, Jean-Paul, Cuenot, Y., Gauthier, Laury, Gonzalez, Patrice, Mouchet, Florence   +6 more
core   +3 more sources

Turned on by genotoxic stress [PDF]

Cell Cycle, 2012
Comment on: Travesa A, et al. EMBO J 2012; 31:1811-22.
Curt Wittenberg, Anna Travesa
openaire   +3 more sources

Genotoxicity evaluation of three anesthetics commonly employed in aquaculture using Oreochromis niloticus and Astyanax lacustris

Aquaculture Reports, 2020
The use of non-plant and plant-derived anesthetics in aquaculture activities is a frequent and necessary practice to maintain fish welfare. Currently anesthetics authorized for use in aquaculture activities are limited, and the use of unauthorized ...
Hélina dos Santos Nascimento, Bruno do Amaral Crispim, Luiza Flávia Veiga Francisco, Felipe Mendes Merey, Fábio Kummrow, Lucilene Finoto Viana, Luís Antonio Kioshi Aoki Inoue, Alexeia Barufatti   +7 more
doaj  

Evaluation of genotoxicity induced by endodontic materials: A systematic review

Saudi Endodontic Journal, 2022
The ability of a substance to cause harm to the DNA molecule is known as genotoxicity. Because there is significant evidence of link between genetic damage and carcinogenesis, determining the real health hazards to patients and dental workers requires a ...
Sadaf Tamanna, Huma Iftekhar, Asmat Fatima, Aaliya Rehman   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

Is There a Causal Association between Genotoxicity and the Imposex Effect? [PDF]

, 2006
There is a growing body of evidence that indicates common environmental pollutants are capable of disrupting reproductive and developmental processes by interfering with the actions of endogenous hormones.
Colborn T, Collins MKL, Cooke H, Depledge MH, Gibbs PE, Harring KE, Harris JO, Josephine A. Hagger, Jörg Oehlmann, Laruelle F, Michael H. Depledge, Smith BS, Susan Jobling, Tamara S. Galloway   +13 more
core   +2 more sources

Impacts of in vivo and in vitro exposures to tamoxifen: comparative effects on human cells and marine organisms [PDF]

, 2019
Tamoxifen (TAM) is a first generation-SERM administered for hormone receptor-positive (HER+) breast cancer in both pre- and post-menopausal patients and may undergo metabolic activation in organisms that share similar receptors and thus face comparable ...
Abessa, D. M. S., Bebianno, M., Carriço, T., Fernandes, E., Fonseca, T. G., Tavares, A.   +5 more
core   +1 more source

Genotoxicity of plant extracts [PDF]

Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 1991
Aqueous extracts of seven species used in Brazilian popular medicine (Achyrocline satureoides, Iodina rhombifolia, Desmodium incanum, Baccharis anomala, Tibouchina asperior, Luehea divaricata, Maytenus ilicifolia) were screened to the presence of mutagenic activity in the Ames test (Salmonella/microsome).
Vargas, Vera M. F., Guidobono, Régis R., Henriques, João A. P.   +2 more
openaire   +5 more sources

Genotoxicity testing of nanomaterials

WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology, 2022
AbstractNanomaterials have outstanding and unprecedented advantageous material properties but may also cause adverse effects in humans upon exposure. Testing nanomaterials for genotoxic properties is challenging because traditional testing methods were designed for small, soluble molecules and may not be easily applicable without modifications.
Robert Landsiedel, Naveed Honarvar, Svenja Berit Seiffert, Barbara Oesch, Franz Oesch   +4 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Flavouring Group Evaluation 217 Revision 3 (FGE.217Rev3): consideration of genotoxic potential for α,β‐unsaturated ketones and precursors from chemical subgroup 4.1 of FGE.19: lactones

EFSA Journal, 2023
The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings of the European Food Safety Authority was requested to evaluate the genotoxic potential of four flavouring substances [FL‐no: 10.023, 10.030, 10.057 and 13.012] from subgroup 4.1 of FGE.19.
EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF), Maged Younes, Gabriele Aquilina, Laurence Castle, Gisela Degen, Karl‐Heinz Engel, Paul J Fowler, Maria José Frutos Fernandez, Peter Fürst, Ursula Gundert‐Remy, Rainer Gürtler, Trine Husøy, Melania Manco, Peter Moldeus, Sabina Passamonti, Romina Shah, Ine Waalkens‐Berendsen, Matthew Wright, Romualdo Benigni, Claudia Bolognesi, Kevin Chipman, Eugenia Cordelli, Maria Carfì, Wim Mennes   +23 more
doaj   +1 more source

White phosphorus genotoxicity

BIO Web of Conferences, 2021
The genotoxicity of white phosphorus was previously evaluated using the Ames test, which demonstrated the absence of toxicity. However, with all the advantages of this method, the use of the Ames test has some shortfallsin assessing genotoxicity.
Mindubaev Anton, Babynin Edward, Minzanova Salima, Badeeva Elena, Akosah Yaw   +4 more
doaj   +1 more source