Results 31 to 40 of about 512 (172)
Interpreting the first results from the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology requires a highly nuanced approach.
doaj +1 more source
Guidance or Misdirection? Unpacking the Role of Feedback in Health Preference Assessments
ABSTRACT This study investigated the impact of providing feedback to respondents on a dominance‐structured choice task on subsequent choice behavior in a discrete choice experiment (DCE). The DCE was conducted among 626 patients with heart failure. Respondents were given a dominance‐structured choice task in which two devices (Device A and Device B ...
Mesfin G. Genie +2 more
wiley +1 more source
As part of the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, we published a Registered Report (Li et al., 2015), that described how we intended to replicate selected experiments from the paper ‘The microRNA miR-34a inhibits prostate cancer stem cells and ...
Xuefei Yan +5 more
doaj +1 more source
Abstract In an adversarial collaboration, two preregistered U.S.‐based studies (total N = 6181) tested three hypotheses regarding the relationship between political ideology and belief rigidity (operationalized as less evidence‐based belief updating): rigidity‐of‐the‐right, symmetry, and rigidity‐of‐extremes.
Shauna M. Bowes +6 more
wiley +1 more source
In 2015, as part of the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, we published a Registered Report (Kandela et al., 2015) that described how we intended to replicate selected experiments from the paper “Coadministration of a tumor-penetrating peptide ...
Christine Mantis +3 more
doaj +1 more source
The Knowledge Map of Sport and Exercise Psychology: An Integrative Perspective
The present work contains a personal perspective on what sport and exercise psychology (SEP) is today. It is a global synthesis of research about psychological aspects related to the context and practice of sport and exercise.
Alexander T. Latinjak +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Correction notices in psychology: impactful or inconsequential? [PDF]
Science is self-correcting, or so the adage goes, but to what extent is that indeed the case? Answering this question requires careful consideration of the various approaches to achieve the collective goal of self-correction.
Tom Heyman, Anne-Sofie Maerten
doaj +1 more source
As scientists, we are prone to biases. These biases can influence our ideas, how we conduct our research and how we interpret our findings. Individual researchers can take active steps to locate and mitigate bias in their own work. We propose a matrix of classifying biases which will help researchers contextualise biases.
Lucy A. Winder +10 more
wiley +1 more source
The Metaparadigm of Scientific Knowledge and Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Legal Culture
The purpose of the research is to assess the prospects for applying methods and approaches from the humanities and exact sciences to understand the genesis, prerequisites, patterns, features, trends, and vectors of the evolution of legal culture as a ...
Maksim V. Zaloilo
doaj +1 more source
The readability of scientific texts is decreasing over time
Clarity and accuracy of reporting are fundamental to the scientific process. Readability formulas can estimate how difficult a text is to read. Here, in a corpus consisting of 709,577 abstracts published between 1881 and 2015 from 123 scientific journals,
Pontus Plavén-Sigray +3 more
doaj +1 more source

