Results 261 to 270 of about 6,833 (299)
Examining the effects of what consumers actually know (i.e., objective knowledge) is an important gap in front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition research. In experiments with over 2,000 primary food shoppers, we examine the moderating impact of objective nutrition
J Craig Andrews +2 more
exaly +4 more sources
Association between the nutrient profile system underpinning the Nutri-Score front-of-pack nutrition label and mortality in the SUN project: A prospective cohort ...
Clara Gomez-Donoso +2 more
exaly +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Interpretive front-of-pack nutrition labels. Comparing competing recommendations
Appetite, 2014Many stakeholders support introducing an interpretive front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition label, but disagree over the form it should take. In late 2012, an expert working group established by the New Zealand government recommended the adoption of an untested summary rating system: a Star label.
Ninya Maubach +2 more
exaly +3 more sources
In Italy, discussions are currently ongoing to implement a front-of-pack nutrition label (FoPL) while a growing number of European countries are adopting the Nutri-Score.
Morgane Fialon +2 more
exaly +3 more sources
An increasing number of studies investigate the effect of front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition labels on consumer choice without considering differences in consumer preferences for product attributes.
Elke Godden, Lukar E Thornton
exaly +1 more source
Efficacy of front-of-pack nutrition labels in improving health status
Nutrition, 2022Nutrition labels advise consumers about the nutritional value of packaged foods and their contribution to the overall composition of the diet. They have been proposed as an instrument for the promotion of healthy diets and as a fundamental tool in the prevention of obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases (NCDs).
Donini, Lorenzo Maria +6 more
openaire +2 more sources
Appetite, 2022
An increasing number of studies investigate the effect of front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition labels on consumer choice without considering differences in consumer preferences for product attributes.
E. Godden +3 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
An increasing number of studies investigate the effect of front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition labels on consumer choice without considering differences in consumer preferences for product attributes.
E. Godden +3 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Consumer acceptability and understanding of front‐of‐pack nutrition labels
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 2013AbstractBackgroundFront‐of‐pack (FOP) nutrition labelling has been proposed as a tool for helping consumers make healthy choices. Before determining its effects on consumer behaviour, factors involved in its use must be elucidated, i.e. understanding and acceptability on the part of the consumer.
Mejean, Caroline +4 more
openaire +4 more sources
Appetite, 2008
In two studies, the impact of eight front-of-pack nutrition labelling formats that differed in complexity was investigated across four European countries. In total 1630 men and women (18-55 yrs) were recruited from Internet panels in the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands for study 1 and 776 in Italy and the United Kingdom for study 2 ...
Gerda I J, Feunekes +4 more
openaire +2 more sources
In two studies, the impact of eight front-of-pack nutrition labelling formats that differed in complexity was investigated across four European countries. In total 1630 men and women (18-55 yrs) were recruited from Internet panels in the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands for study 1 and 776 in Italy and the United Kingdom for study 2 ...
Gerda I J, Feunekes +4 more
openaire +2 more sources

