Undergraduate EFL learners’ preferences for three different types of written corrective feedback
The present study examined undergraduate EFL learners’ preferences for three different types of written corrective feedback: direct, indirect, and metalinguistic. The participants were undergraduate students from various colleges at Hail University.
Monera Almohawes
doaj +1 more source
Students’ Perception to the Use of Indirect Corrective Feedback in Writing Recount Text
Providing written corrective feedback is a necessity to help language learner improve accuracy. This research aims to seek out students’ response toward the use of Indirect Corrective Feedback to reduce error on students’ recount text. Tenth graders of SMAN 1 Meulaboh were the sample of this study and observed during the correction. Data from the close-
Endah Anisa Rahma +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Although research on peer feedback in second language teaching and learning has been developed from various perspectives over the past three decades, less is known about feedback in translation settings.
Zhong Lin +3 more
doaj +1 more source
THE EFFICACY OF INDIRECT CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN IMPROVING STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXTS [PDF]
Feedback is an essential element of a process approach to writing. Indirect Corrective Feedback involves indicating that the student has made an error without actually correcting it.
Putri, Esti Tri Astuti
core
Direct and Indirect Written Corrective Feedback: Lecturers’ Perspectives
This study focuses on addressing the influence that written corrective feedback (WCF) has on English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. Therefore, this research endeavored to give more clarity on the challenges ahead of EFL lecturers in providing WCF and explored the types of WCF (direct/indirect), as well as the lecturers’ opinions on the ...
Shahab, Mohammed Luqman +1 more
openaire +2 more sources
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INDIRECT WRITTEN CORRECTION ON ENGLISH WRITING SKILLS
This study purposed to gain the difference between students’ academic performance in writing skills who are taught by using indirect written correction and those do not.
Aprillia Ariyanti
doaj +1 more source
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN IMPROVING EFL LEARNERS’ HORTATORY EXPOSITION WRITING [PDF]
: At present, research has not adequately dealt with corrective feedback (Mirzaii & Aliabadi, 2013). Adam (2003) claims that written production and feedback are important for SLA.
Rustipa, Katharina
core
The cerebellum could solve the motor error problem through error increase prediction [PDF]
We present a cerebellar architecture with two main characteristics. The first one is that complex spikes respond to increases in sensory errors. The second one is that cerebellar modules associate particular contexts where errors have increased in the ...
O'Reilly, Randall C. +1 more
core +2 more sources
AN ANALYSIS OF TYPE AND PURPOSE OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN STUDENTS’ WRITING TEXT: A CASE STUDY AT SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 6 SURAKARTA [PDF]
The reserch is about Corrective Feedback Analysis. The aims of this research are: 1) to describe the type of corrective feedback that used by the teacher in SMP Muhammadiyah 6 Surakarta, 2) to find out the purpose of corrective feedback.
, Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M. Hum +1 more
core
Improving Grammatical Accuracy in Thai Learners' Writing : Comparing Direct and Indirect Written Corrective Feedback [PDF]
Written corrective feedback (WCF) is widely used to point students to the grammatical errors in their written work and help reduce them. This paper reports a quasi-experimental study that compared the effectiveness of direct and indirect teacher WCF in a Thai context.
Kok Eng Tan, Apinya Manochphinyo
openaire +1 more source

