Results 71 to 80 of about 8,240 (138)
AbstractAimsThe Australian Dietary Guidelines are currently being revised and ultra‐processed foods have been identified as a high priority action area. To better understand how well the current Dietary Guidelines align with level of processing classifications, the aim of this study was to assess the alignment between the Australian Dietary Guidelines ...
Hillary Nguyen +8 more
openaire +2 more sources
Background/Objectives: Classifying foods by processing has gained traction, with NOVA the most widely used framework. NOVA helped shift focus away from nutrients toward food processing, but has been critiqued for rigidity, inconsistent classifications, and weak links to health outcomes.
Jessica L Campbell +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Comparison of food processing classification frameworks in the NHANES 2017-2018. [PDF]
Du S +6 more
europepmc +1 more source
Are all ultra-processed foods bad? A criticism of the food processing classification systems. [PDF]
Babashahi M, Hashemi Moghaddam SF.
europepmc +1 more source
Artificial intelligence applications for assessing ultra-processed food consumption: a scoping review. [PDF]
Campbell JL +3 more
europepmc +1 more source
Are ultra-processed foods too tasty? Toward a metabolic framework for diet and obesity. [PDF]
Ludwig DS.
europepmc +1 more source
Large Language Models for Real-World Nutrition Assessment: Structured Prompts, Multi-Model Validation and Expert Oversight. [PDF]
Ase A +3 more
europepmc +1 more source
Comparison of nutrients and ultra-processed food consumption between different phenotypes defined by abdominal obesity and sarcopenia. [PDF]
Jang E +9 more
europepmc +1 more source

