Results 21 to 30 of about 7,401 (261)
Scientific argumentation skill required to be mastered in this era. Unfortunately many students still have strunggle improving their scientific argumentation skills.
Sindy Nurinda +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Scientific Argumentation in Teaching Hydrogen Bonding
This study was conducted to determine the differences in the conceptual understanding of 52 Turkish students who were taught with a scientific argumentation approach in grade 12 chemistry.
Nejla Gültepe
doaj +1 more source
Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa pada Hukum Newton di Sekolah Menengah Atas
: Physics learning need to train ability that scientists can apply in developing knowledge, that is scientific argumentation ability. Scientific argumentation ability is very important in preparing students who are literate in science.
Adetya Rahman +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Students should have the capability to argue about controversial science issues that are relevant to them and that impact society. These controversial issues, called socio-scientific issues (SSI), are influenced by social, ethical and moral norms.
Nahid Parween Anwar, Muhammad Abid Ali
doaj +4 more sources
This study aims to examine the effect of Science-Technology-Society (STS) learning unit on the Work and Energy topic in developing grade 10 students’ scientific argumentation.
Jirutthitikan Pimvichai +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Profile of The First Year Student’s Argumentation Skills on General Chemistry Courses at a Public University in West Sumatera: A Preliminary Study [PDF]
Scientific argumentation is one of the key components of habits of mind, while habits of mind are one dimension of scientific literacy that should be developed in Indonesia.
Gazali Fauzana +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Akaike and the No Miracle Argument for Scientific Realism
AbstractThe “No Miracle Argument” for scientific realism contends that the only plausible explanation for the predictive success of scientific theories is their truthlikeness, but doesn’t specify what ‘truthlikeness’ means. I argue that if we understand ‘truthlikeness’ in terms of Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence, the resulting realist thesis (RKL) is ...
openaire +2 more sources
Managing uncertainty in scientific argumentation [PDF]
AbstractArgumentation is a core practice of science that inherently contains uncertainty. Relatively few studies have examined the role of uncertainty within argumentation and how teachers manage uncertainty leading to conceptual development. This design‐based, multiple‐case study employed the constant comparative method to analyze 24 videos focused on
Ying‐Chih Chen +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Three Arguments For Scientific Freedom
The principle of scientific freedom usually is taken for granted; few attempts have been made to justify it systematically. The present paper discusses three "classic" arguments, which are used to justify this principle. It will become clear (a) that each argument refers to a different understanding of science and, therefore, justifies a different type
openaire +2 more sources
Background: Scientific argumentation is an essential competence in science education because it requires students to evaluate evidence, justify claims, and construct evidence-based reasoning. These processes are closely associated with critical thinking.
Siti Ni’matul Fitriyah +3 more
doaj +1 more source

